It is impossible to rewrite history books without finding and correcting an inaccuracy in historical documentation or by eradicating truth to be replaced with fabrication.
What they are all doing at the moment is writing history. When we glance at historical data with no prior knowledge then the first thing we see are the championship standings. When we look deeper and analyse the data we see two drivers where one has more wins, more podiums, more pole positions, more leading championship final results, more overtakes, more fastest laps, higher average finishing and qualifying positions and so on. That is just the positives. If we then look at the negatives we see a driver who has had more mechanical failures, more mechanical retirements, more team failures, more personal adversity.
So Lewis has had more of the worst and more of the best and still comes out on top.
We can then look a little deeper and actually watch the races, at which point it becomes subjective.
Alternatively to all of this, we can decide not to look deeper at all and judge the book by it's cover. An opinion of a book based on it's cover will never stand up against an opinion about a book based on it's contents.