I've said it before, the FIA deliberately make the rules ambiguous for a reason.
It is a hell of a lot of fun to just make stuff up as you go along!
I guess if you spell things out too clearly, you leave yourself very little wiggle room.
I've said it before, the FIA deliberately make the rules ambiguous for a reason.
Isn't this slightly ambiguous as well? Does this mean that a front wing couldn't be changed? Or could a team pit for bodywork damage AND a tire change. If it can be (Fill in the Blank) AND changing tires, isn't this rule irrelevant.
Sorry, this is completely off-topic, but I just saw the University of Leicester debating ad at the top of this page, asking the question, "Should Man go to Mars?".
And my immediate thought was that yes, at least Piers Morgan should.
Countryside - a desire to kill Piers Morgan
The second thought i had watching this is about the drag reduction. Everyone is speaking whether drag reduction will be enough to make a pass into the first corner, where i believe it has been set for in the first 3 races, but watching these highlights it may have a much bigger effect on the corners that follow. In the highlights all passes were either made at corner 1 or 3. If drag reduction can only get a driver close at corner 1 when we go to monza, assuming that is where it is used, then they will be in a great position for corner 3 because they be closer enough to get a great slipstream on the run up to it.
Looking at Australia, this could be exactly the same for corners 1 and 3 there. As long as a driver can get close and stay there through corner 1 an 2, there will be a second opportunity with the long run to corner 3 with a good slipstream. Don't know if this has been mentioned before but could be very interesting.
That is a really good point, and if this seems to be the case, an enlightened drag reduction placement would be welcomed. For example, at Silverstone:
View attachment 1156
It may be better to put the line on the Hangar Straight rather than the Wellington Straight since no-one's going to pass anyone at Luffield, when compared to the penultimate corner.
The other possibility is, of course, that a driver uses his ARW to threaten the guy in front, forcing him to use KERS and then the attacker can use his KERS to do a Hamilton09!
I should point out that I won't be tracking engine and gearbox usage this season as part of the Race Hub data.
Anyone else is free to do so if they wish.
Not necessarily.Australian GP - all cars engine No1, gearbox No1.