Suzuka = 0.1 ahead
Brazil 0.2 ahead
And of course Jenson was clear of Lewis when he retired in these races...
Suzuka = 0.1 ahead
Brazil 0.2 ahead
Of course it's the bloody clean side of the track what are people jabbering on about?Cook, I do not have any absolute proof that the pole sitters start place was any cleaner than that of the second driver. However, numerous commentators have said that the pole position on the great majority of circuits is on the clean side, from what I saw of qualifying and the race (the BBC didn't show it all) the preferred line for the drivers was on the pole position side of the circuit, so the natural assumption is (imo, as ever) that the pole position for this year's Australian GP was on the clean side.
Do you have any proof that it wasn't? If so I would not mind being corrected.
riskitall said "didnt button win a race before lewis in 2010 and lewis win a race before button in 2011?
and lewis beat button in 2010 and button beat lewis in 2011.so so far the driver that hasnt won the first race has gone on to beat the other driver over a season."
Had he written "pole position" then I would have responded likewise (except that in both those seasons Hamilton had the first pole of the pair so riskitall's premise would not have worked).
All this is, of course, my opinion. However I will give you one FACT. There are a number of Hamilton supporters who seem to be having difficulty with Button beating Hamilton by driving faster on a dry circuit. They are coming up with all sorts of statements which they cannot prove and are also unlikely.
The will be races which suit Button more than Hamilton, there will be races which suit Hamilton more than Button. In these the tendency will be that the faster driver of the pair on that day will beat the other fair and square.
I have had my say and, unless something new comes up, I will read the responses to this thread but am unlikely to reply.
Only once has 3rd place won...Out of the last 16 Australian GPs in Melbourne the pole sitter has gone on to win the championship 14 times (87.5%) and the race winner has gone on to win the championship 11 times (68.75%).
Of course it's the bloody clean side of the track what are people jabbering on about?
On the other side of the coin..........Writing Hamilton off after 1 race would be very unwise indeed.
Yes Hamilton had a poor start but if you were watching carefully (Well not that carefully because it was as plain as day and it was being explained at the time) Jenson also had a poor start he shifted to early into second gear and got bogged down slightly, so it is even more surprising he got to the first corner first...
Edit
This was seen on the onboard footage after the race...
Especially after his poor start was determined by his engineers to may have been caused by a small issue with his clutch, and possibly could have been a major reason why Lewis lost the race too the first turn.
ttp://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98230
Hungary = 0.1 behind, beats Lewis in race
Spa = Jenson qualified well down field
Monza = Less than 0.1 behind, beats Lewis in race
Signapore = Less than 0.1 ahead, beats Lewis in race
Suzuka = 0.1 ahead
Korea = 0.3 behind, finishes close behind Lewis
India = 0.4 behind, beats Lewis in race
Abu Dhabi = Less than 0.1 behind, Finished well behind Lewis
Brazil 0.2 ahead
Oz 2012 = Less that 0.1 behind, beat Lewis in race.
So more often than not Jenson has been slower slightly slower in quali, but has beaten Lewis in the races. This trend has carried on into 2012. I hope Lewis is aware of this and must stop this to have any chance of beating Jenson this year.
I was just making an observation that's all nothing more nothing less..My powers of observation may not be at your high level, but Hamilton's clutch problem wasn't his fault, and without that problem he stood a better chance of taking advantage of Button's mistake into the first turn.