Got to disagree - the Lewis Hamilton I know is faster and better than that and I think he'd be the first to agree
But there is no evidence or indication at all that he was slower than he should have been. Not a shred.
Got to disagree - the Lewis Hamilton I know is faster and better than that and I think he'd be the first to agree
But there is no evidence or indication at all that he was slower than he should have been. Not a shred.
He was behind Sergio Perez in a Sauber and although you're concluding from the lap times he car was quicker there is also not a shred of evidence to suggest the conditions would suddenly make a car that was 1.2 seconds slower than Lewis in quali a quicker car so you have to conclude that Perez out drove Hamilton which is why I'm saying I believe he is quicker than that because I do not believe that Sergio Perez in those conditions is that much a faster driver than Lewis Hamilton.
Maybe I'll be proved wrong one day but right now thats what I'm thinking.
Nothing to do with Malaysia, but I thought I should add my thoughts to this thread...
I think Lewis is sometimes a victim of his own flexibility. Whilst Jenson really struggles with a car that isn't just how he likes it, Lewis is much more likely to just get on with it and have fun driving round the problem. With strategy and managing tyres now being much more important with the Pirellis, the current rules probably favour Jenson who I perceive to be more sensitive to small changes in the car's behaviour.
I don't think you'll be proved wrong, but I must say the evidence you provide for your thinking is extremely simplistic, to say the least. That said, I don't think I'm going to change your thinking and I don't think I can offer much more to sway your conclusions so we've probably exhausted the conversation and will have to agree to disagree.
I just think if you went to Lewis and said "I think you had a near pefect race yesterday" he'd laugh and tell you he could drive much better - I think he'd say the same thing about Melbourne too.
i don't think he'd try and tell you it was about clutch problems and set ups he'd say he could drive better - and I believe he can - and will.
Jenson wasn't struggling with his car till he crashed, it was only after he pitted and went on a charge to catch up that he wasted his tyres
For your information, he has already said that it was down to clutch problems and going the wrong way with his front wing set-up in Melbourne.
Actually he said his bad start was down to the clutch problem. Which is probably true. I don't think he said thats why he didn't perform the whole race. Nor would I ever think he would.
One place where Lewis does get my total respect is he's not one that blames his own bad performances on car issues - which is why it annoys me when everyone else tries to do it for him
Based on your other posts, I have to say I'm extremely surprised at the stance you have taken.
I thought you had a better understanding of F1 than that.
You have completely dismissed the conditions as if they are irrelevant.
Weather and track conditions dictate the set-up.
*shrugs"
I haven't dismissed the conditions as if they are irrelevent and I'm not counting them out (notice I haven't mentioned Alonso) I've just never seen such a massive swing in car performaces before as we saw between the Sauber and the Mclaren on the Sunday. Now if Kobi had been up there as well I might have just agreed but I can't understand how the conditions have swung Perez who on average was half a second a lap down on Lewis(not counting Q3 because I don't know if Perez did a proper run) to be half a second a lap faster. Whilst I accept that conditions and set-ups certainly would have made a difference I don't believe they could have made that much of a difference. Hence I'm putting it down to Sergio performing out of his skin and Lewis not performing to his peak a little.
I am in now way saying Lewis was rubbish/awful but just disputing the fact that his performance was brilliant as stated early or that he had a near pefect race as stated earlier
Why are you so surprised though by the differential? LH was faster than JB, SP was faster than KK, SP was faster than LH, KK was faster than JB
Conclusion? The Suaber was faster than the McLarens under those conditions probably due to set up. This happens regularly and is where many a surprise win has come from, Vettel in the SR and Buttons maiden win quick examples
quali pace is never equal to a full race pace, not even in the dry when nothing changed since quali , let alone different conditions
KK was fatser than JB?
Too many pies?