The Artist..... it often takes something highly unusual to result in much needed change so if nothing else hopefully this will be a catalyst for a safety car rule revamp.
I disagree. If you can get away with anything in a championship finale as long you win, then that sets a terrible standard for the sport. It's not okay to win the championship by cheating as long as you do it in the final race.However much I wanted Hamilton to be champion right now, what outcome would people want from the Mercedes’ protests? In any other race I’d be okay with overturning the result. However this is a championship decision and Red Bull have done nothing wrong here.
That said I’ve no doubt in my mind that Masi wouldn’t have done that in any other race.
The only fair thing, if they were determined to finish as a race, would have been red flag and standing restart.
I have. My view would be no different.My suggestion is that people imagine that the positions of the two cars is reversed, then after intense thought decide whether or not their view of the decision has changed.
I sick of this. I've been reading it a number of times on Twitter.My suggestion is that people imagine that the positions of the two cars is reversed, then after intense thought decide whether or not their view of the decision has changed.
I have the same point of view. The issue is the guy who dominated the race and did everything right got screwed over by a totally unprecedented and arbitrary decision from the stewards. Regardless of whether roles were reversed, the issue here is they should have either let all cars unlap and had less "racing" or they should have let no cars unlap. What unfolded was an engineered decision to give the race to the slower driver who did nothing to earn the victory.My suggestion is that people imagine that the positions of the two cars is reversed, then after intense thought decide whether or not their view of the decision has changed.
I was thinking about this about Liuzxi's past association with Red Bull. He was billed as the big thing by Red Bull and got the usual Helmut disposal treatment once they realised Vettel was going to be better so I don't know why he did not have more balls to do something. He owes Red Bull nothingDid you know, the Drivers steward in Brazil who decided that it's perfectly fine to run a driver wide and make no attempt to hit the apex of a corner was Vitantonio Liuzzi.
Who's he you ask? A Red Bull junior driver and former Red Bull and Toro Rosso driver.
The football analogy is true Lewis dominated the race right to the last lap until Masi decided to change the rules.I found it interesting reading comments from non F1 fans that tuned in for this one.
One described the situation as a team being 10-0 up and the referee declaring next goal wins.
Well that’s something we’ve come to live with with safety car situations which when you think about it like that is a bit ridiculous.
The difference here is he gave Max a penalty.
That wasn’t motor racing. It certainly wasn’t a fair motor racing.
I think Masi has taken the shine off this championship so we need to see what happens with the appeal whether his joy will be shortlived or notRed Bull and Verstappen were very lucky on Sunday, that is not in doubt. But this one race in itself did not result in the championship going to one driver or another. The whole season has to be looked at, if you are talkimg about stewards' decisions and other times when luck played its part. Like Adrian Newey mentioned in the post-race interview, I still have an issue about Copse. After that I felt that unless Lewis won the WDC by 25 points or more then there would have been a miscarriage of justice. Over the course of the season, when things have arisen between Lewis and Max, where Max came off worse he generally lost a lot (25 points, British GP and elsewhere) and when Lewis came off worse he lost 7 points or thereabouts (Abu Dhabi and elsewhere). Hence as unfair as it seems, Max is the rightful WDC this year. I believe this view is also the view of the (majority of the) paddock, whatever you think about Sunday's race.
I believe this view is also the view of the (majority of the) paddock, whatever you think about Sunday's race.
”There’s a requirement in the sporting regulations to wave all the lapped cars past,” Masi said.
“From that point, it was position six onwards that were still running [on the lead lap], so between 10 or 11 cars had to unlap themselves.
“Therefore the Safety Car period was a bit longer than what we would have normally expected.”
yeah I think that. i genuinely like to hear to from masi & what ever happens it will be a learning experience for him100% agree The Artist.....
I don’t think there was any bias in what Masi did, I think he panicked under the pressure and got it very, very wrong.