They still sound like racing cars,
despite what Ecclestone says. And instead of the monotone, ear-splitting scream of the old naturally aspirated V8s, the new V6 turbo hybrids have a multi-dimensional tone.
The cars are much quieter than before. There is no argument about that. But was the old engine sound particularly enjoyable? It was certainly loud. Painfully so, in fact - anyone watching at the track needed ear defenders if they did not want to risk deafness. But it was hardly a classic engine noise in the manner of a throbbing American V8 muscle car or a singing F1 Ferrari V12 from the 1990s, for example. It was more like a swarm of angry wasps amplified throughMetallica's sound system.
How Ecclestone can be "horrified" by something he has not heard other than on a test bed in the Ferrari factory more than a year ago is not clear, nor is the agenda behind his remarks.
Renault made it clear that
they would quit F1if the new engines were not adopted. The French company needed the technology in the sport to have some relevance to the direction its road cars were going if it was going to be able to continue to justify the enormous investment.
Last year, the 2.4-litre V8s were producing around 760bhp and using in the region of 150kg of fuel to complete a race distance. This year's turbo hybrids pump out as much as 850bhp and use only 100kg of fuel in a race. That's an increase of efficiency in the region of 35% - for significantly more performance.
Lap times are about three seconds slower than last year at the moment, but at least half of that is a result of the harder tyres, and much of the rest down to the loss of downforce - which, when combined with that extra power, makes the cars a greater challenge for the drivers.
Or, as
one of my followers on Twitter wrote: "I'm blown away to learn people were spending hundreds of pounds to attend a race just to hear a really loud noise."