He can't erase that impression simply because it is repeated unnecessarily by some, unhindered by the burden of proof.
Unhindered by proof? Are you saying that there is NO evidence that MW;
talks more about JB even when LH is asked about ( but let's talk about Jenson)
Wept real tears in public at a JB win but not LH
Told the BBC red button forum in 2010 that he had agreed, if JB won a race he qualified badly in, that he would kiss him not just on both cheeks but inbetween
Thinks JB and LH are 'disturbingly good looking'
Said JB had messed up LHs head in conflict with LHs own version of events
I just don't remember ever ever hearing a manager so obviously rooting for one driver and so eager to justify said drivers employment
So who here truly believes MW does not prefer JB? that is not a big deal he employed JB and everyone has preferences and tastes, my issue is the possibility for unprofessionalism when it comes to doing the job of managing two top drivers in a team where strategy and data are provided to both equally by the team
I am not saying thre is corruption at work, not at all, just clinical naivety maybe, maybe in Quints words infatuation