I hope there are some tennis fans around here, because I was having an intense discussion with my father over the whole Federer-Isner match about this Hawk-Eye related question.
Player A hits a first serve and no one calls it out. Player B returns the serve in a way that player A can not return the ball.
That means it is 0-15!
Now could player A make a challenge, indicating that his first serve was actually out, in order to serve again (second serve), if his challenge would prove to be successful?
So in general: Can you challenge a call or non-call that was made (right or wrong) in your advantage in the first place?
I hope you guys know what I'm talking about. I think player A should have the right to challenge, even though it seems to be stretching the spirit of the rule![Smile :) :)](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)
Player A hits a first serve and no one calls it out. Player B returns the serve in a way that player A can not return the ball.
That means it is 0-15!
Now could player A make a challenge, indicating that his first serve was actually out, in order to serve again (second serve), if his challenge would prove to be successful?
So in general: Can you challenge a call or non-call that was made (right or wrong) in your advantage in the first place?
I hope you guys know what I'm talking about. I think player A should have the right to challenge, even though it seems to be stretching the spirit of the rule
![Smile :) :)](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)