Why not give them yellow helmets. In a plain car that narrows it down to Webber, Hamilton, Perez, Rosberg, anyone who is Brazilian/a fan of Senna and, let's face it, Vettel.
Not sure publicity events are comparable with a private test run by a supplier to the entire grid. Of course I'm assuming that remark was meant to be sarcastic cider_and_toast.
Edit: Other comments posted whilst I was thinking about mine. However, I happen to think the plain helmets were a prudent measure considering that the test was instigated by Pirelli for Pirelli. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of Mercedes participation, having a media and fan frenzy around two of the sports top drivers would surely have interfered with the work. The security issues may indeed be the issues at the foremost of the decision. The fact is it was not as stupid or as misleading a thing to do as we may be led to believe.
I had no idea that there had been threats made against Lewis and Nico to warrant concerns about their safety, surely the police should investigate this immediately....
Must be threats from fans/stalkers with SAS experience if they can break into a locked Grand Prix circuit and manage to intercept their target before they get back to the safety of the garage amongst the dozens and dozens of mechanics, personel trainers and circuit security that ate there.
Lets be honest they are in more danger driving from the hotel to the circuit than they were at testing.
Were the cars stripped of advertising or not? I can imagine no advertising simply from the point of view that testing might not be part of the sponsorship agreement. But it does seem rather silly.
If Mercedes are putting forward a proposal of what penalty they get given should be surely that in itself is an admission of guilt...
What do you think of Mercedes' proposal that they are banned from the Young Driver Test? CH: "I can't see how much of a sanction...They've already done their test with senior drivers so being banned from a Young Driver Test probably isn't much of a sanction."
"Quite a lot of mirth already at the news that tweeting will not be permitted from inside the hearing once it begins. For the record, we're also in the dark as to whether this ban is covered by the sporting or technical regulations... Still, what could be more appropriate than a hearing into a 'private' test being carried out in private?"
Pete Gill, Sky shortly after the start of proceedings.
NBC Sports (USA) aired Steve Matchett interviewing Nico Rosberg before the GP of Canada. When the subject turned to Pirelli-gate, Nico began to squirm. He hem-hawed and kicked at the ground and averted his gaze and in general looked like the cat that just ate the canary. Steve only tossed softballs and didn't try to nail Nico down (not that I would have expected him to) but when the interview was over, Lee Diffey (who I never really had cared for, ...up until that moment) said that Nico pretty clearly was behaving like someone who had something to hide. It definitely needed saying.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.