The problem is, everything is getting so extreme.
I'm one of the current tyre's biggest critics, but even I wouldn't argue that the only proper alternative is balls-out, no-holds barred racing, flat out for the whole 200 miles. That's never happened in F1, and would probably be pretty tedious if it did. Formula 1 has always been about a balance of driver, team, machine and conditions be they tyres, weather, fuel, mechanical reliability etc.
As
Kewee points out, F1 sits somewhere between sprint and endurance racing but yet distinct from both, with its own unique character and challenges. That's what I have always loved about it (even though I have been going off it recently).
This is the problem I have with these tyres; they are too extreme, at the opposite end of the scale to flat-out racing, which is why I hate them. They have gone too far in the attempt to 'improve the show'.
Hopefully, following the FIA ruling on the matter, other than the structural changes to eliminate the catastrophic failures any adjustments felt necessary to affect the racing can now be made by tweaking the compounds taken to each race rather than changing the tyre construction, which would inevitably have risked questions about the validity of the eventual champion at the end of the season.