There's an interesting article on the new Pirelli tyre range for the 2013 season on the F1 site.
Look away now if you're not a fan of degradation...
I'm slightly confused as to why so many people in the business think overtaking still needs to be improved.
Even if they continue to ignore our data, Mercedes came up with almost identical figures and those have been published on the F1 site and discussed on Sky and BBC.
How many more than an average of 60 overtakes per Grand Prix are they actually aiming for?
And what's the point of an overtake on a car with tyres which have all the performance of a melted marshmallow?
Look away now if you're not a fan of degradation...
http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2013/1/14205.htmlFormula One tyre suppliers Pirelli have unveiled what they describe as a ‘revolutionised’ new range of tyres for the 2013 season, with the aim of producing more pit stops and increasing overtaking.
Both the dry and wet-weather tyre ranges have been revised with compounds becoming softer, the structure of the tyres more flexible and the shoulder of the tyres reinforced.
The Italian manufacturer has said that the object of these changes was to improve performance and to increase thermal degradation in order to ensure at least two pit stops per car, per race and to open up more strategic options for the teams.
I'm slightly confused as to why so many people in the business think overtaking still needs to be improved.
Even if they continue to ignore our data, Mercedes came up with almost identical figures and those have been published on the F1 site and discussed on Sky and BBC.
How many more than an average of 60 overtakes per Grand Prix are they actually aiming for?
And what's the point of an overtake on a car with tyres which have all the performance of a melted marshmallow?