By the way, the Massa and Button incidents are not generally agreed to be his fault. Those incidents are as debatable as the rest of them. If you recall, in Buttons case he apologised to Lewis.
Certainly the Massa one, then! He went for a gap that wasn't there - Massa didn't do anything wrong.
A hate to sit on the fence, but I think that it was 50/50, much like the Hamilton/Kobayashi incident yesterday. Webber should have seen Hamilton on the inside, and Hamilton should have gotten out of the throttle. Very much 50/50.Going back to an earlier reference in this thread, who do you think was at fault in the Hamilton/Webber incident in Singapore?
As should have Massa.A hate to sit on the fence, but I think that it was 50/50, much like the Hamilton/Kobayashi incident yesterday. Webber should have seen Hamilton on the inside, and Hamilton should have gotten out of the throttle. Very much 50/50.
As could have Kobayashi.He could have taken Button on the other side.
A hate to sit on the fence, but I think that it was 50/50, much like the Hamilton/Kobayashi incident yesterday. Webber should have seen Hamilton on the inside, and Hamilton should have gotten out of the throttle. Very much 50/50.
Also, as I am extremely stubborn, I still regard the Hamilton/Button incident as very much Hamilton's fault. He could have taken Button on the other side.
TBY
Your claim that Hamilton was ever blamed for the McLaren pilferage of Ferrari data has really left me confused, as I have never seen, heard or read such allegations. Please clarify this for me.
Less reputable forums than this contained copious amounts of written diaorhea claiming Hamilton must surely have been involved, a beneficiary of, or otherwise contaminated by the scandal. I recall some ventured to suggest that Hamilton the rookie could in no way challenge for the championship in '07 were it not for the stolen Ferrari data making the McLaren superior to everything else on the grid.TBY
Your claim that Hamilton was ever blamed for the McLaren pilferage of Ferrari data has really left me confused, as I have never seen, heard or read such allegations. Please clarify this for me.
A hate to sit on the fence, but I think that it was 50/50, much like the Hamilton/Kobayashi incident yesterday. Webber should have seen Hamilton on the inside, and Hamilton should have gotten out of the throttle. Very much 50/50.
Also, as I am extremely stubborn, I still regard the Hamilton/Button incident as very much Hamilton's fault. He could have taken Button on the other side.
Was just checking. Was on the hunt for double standards. I won't tell you my conclusions.
As should have Massa.
As could have Kobayashi.
Hence why some people consider there to be double standards.
CSF
"Most teams do" it???!!! Not to my knowledge, they don't.
Whats going on there lauda? Dont you like the boy?
Niki Lauda is again opening his trap, saying Hamilton could be one of the best in F1 if he didn't make stupid mistakes.
THE PROBLEM WITH THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT ALL THE EXAMPLES USED AGAINST HIM ARE THINGS HE SAID BEFORE HE EVEN SAW THE REPLAY. KOBAYASHI INCEDENT: HE SAID IT WAS KAMUIS FAULT BUT LATER SAID THE OPPOSITE AFTER SEEING A REPLAY
I TYPED THIS ALL IN CAPITALS FOR ATTENTION :|