Yes, we did and we are arguing the same issue without progress. My intent is not to drive anyone into insanity, however I am trying to understand your point of view. I can spend another hour listing treacherous watters with this move, yet I am still lacking understanding benefits. Who will benefit from such budgetary restrictions? I thought you should know since you are long standing proponent of such regulation. I am not even sure if I understand what effect you can expect. It cannot be greater competitiveness, I don't think that what is expected. I am not trying to be aggressive, but you have never - as I can recall - elaborated on vision how F1 would work with budget limits. I also do not know about anyone who agreed to relax technical regulation for set budget. Currently there is no such thing.
Not to be complete negative, yes, F1 could be less expensive, why not, life could be lived in modest home instead villa, but isn't such a decision in hands of teams and technical regulators? As expressed in the past, I repeat, if you build a space shuttle, you pay for space shuttle. If you want less expensive car, regulate series with simpler race cars through technical downgrade. Wouldn't that be an answer?