Fenderman
Rooters Reporter
I totally agree about the impossibility of absolute consistency, Mephistopheles , and yes the Stewards are often faced with difficulties when deciding where to draw the line. The thing is, where Kimi was concerned, did he not return to the track in an unsafe manner and cause a collision? Anyway, as F1Yorkshire says, I've criticized him on another thread. What snowy 's OP is about here is Charlie's chestnut, or should I say his catchphrase: "Because everybody else does it, that does not make it right." Has Charlie, or maybe it was just the Steward, changing the tune, by actually stating as one of their reasons as a mitigation that "any other driver would have done the same thing." ?
It's like using the legal term "Custom and practise". We have many an instance of regulation changes and clarifications that have either supplanted or affirmed existing custom and practise (i.e. what drivers usually, normally or habitually did) so we know they are not averse to that. It's somewhat unusual of the FIA to use a "custom and practise" argument as a reason for no further action. Personally, I'm now wondering if that approach is setting a potentially dangerous precedent.
It's like using the legal term "Custom and practise". We have many an instance of regulation changes and clarifications that have either supplanted or affirmed existing custom and practise (i.e. what drivers usually, normally or habitually did) so we know they are not averse to that. It's somewhat unusual of the FIA to use a "custom and practise" argument as a reason for no further action. Personally, I'm now wondering if that approach is setting a potentially dangerous precedent.