If only Harry Hill actually did that one!
what exactly do you mean by Hamilton debacle? Did Hamilton cause a debacle here?This already is a Hamilton debacle.
As for other's opinions, they have can them fine but it's when they claim to quote people to reinforce their point with no actual person or website to quote from that it becomes quite obvious that clearly they are partial to one opinion and nothing anyone can say is going to change that.
In a well written article in Autosport by Mark Hughes drivers skills are analysed, how they react to g-force, rotation and yaw. Apparantly its felt between the coccyx and the third vetebra.Ceccarelli(an expert in the field) says theres no where near enough study been done on this to optimise driver's performances.Lots in the article. Basically its why Vettel was so good at quali. its why hamilton is sensational around Monacco, Senna Donnington 83, Hamilton Silverstone08 Vettel Monza 08 and the reverse..the silky smooth driver ...Button China '10 Lots more,its a long article. Apparantly dealling with oversteer in the zones that induce it will give a less understeery car elsewhere and therefore more total grip over the lap. the great drivers Senna , Schumacher, Mansell (I'd add Vettel and Hamilton) all had the ability. BUT when it comes to setting up the McLaren i read this."Whenever their is a divergence of opinion on Friday, the team invariably follow Button's preference, probably secure in the knowledge that hamilton will be able to drive well regardless of the car's traits, whereas Button loses more of his performance if the car is not exactly as he needs it. Whoah!!!How to reward your most skillfull driver, give him a car that doesnt play to his skills in favour of a less versatile driver!!!
Some of the stuff on this thread is completely rubbish.
I'm a Hamilton fan myself (not a Lewis fan because I'm not on first name basis with him) and I can clearly see that he is being outperformed by Button fair and square. (In my opinion) I put this down to both regulation change (Pirelli rubber) and just a general dip in performance. Button isn't a world champion for no reason. I just don't know why some of Hamilton's fans constantly feel the need to make excuses for him when he doesn't perform perfectly.
1 lap Lewis, multiple laps Jenson.....
Okay to add to it.....The horrible irony of this is that the main reason I like Lewis is for his race craft, but I think since the pirelli's came in this has become the prevailing opinion. I don't think it is as cut and dry as this though. I'd say on average, Lewis is faster on track too, but Jenson seems to win out at the moment with his more methodical approach.
Okay to add to it.....
Dry - 1 lap Lewis, multiple laps Jenson
Wet - 1 lap ????? (not sure), multiple laps Jenson (easy)
What do you reckon, in the wet 1 lap shootout between Jenson & Lewis?
Okay to add to it.....
Dry - 1 lap Lewis, multiple laps Jenson
Wet - 1 lap ????? (not sure), multiple laps Jenson (easy)
What do you reckon, in the wet 1 lap shootout between Jenson & Lewis?
Okay to develop further I'll add to it.....In the wet, I would say that if there isn't an element of strategy involved then Hamilton is the faster - take his pass on Button at Melbourne in 2010, and his leading (of the two) towards the start at Britain (from behind) and Hungary last year - in addition to Fuji in 2007 and the perfect wet race at Silverstone in 2008.
However, if the race becomes a "right tyre, right time" changeable conditions think-a-thon, then there is no doubt that Button is going to have the legs on Hamilton, as witnessed by his defeat of Hamilton in Hungary in 2011 and Australia and China in 2010, and not to mention Hamilton tyre-call brainfarts such as at Monza in 2008 to which Sebastian Vettel is infinitely endebted.
Okay to develop further I'll add to it.....
Full Dry - 1 lap Lewis, multiple laps Jenson
Full Wet - 1 lap Lewis, multiple laps Jenson (easy)
Changeable - 1 lap Jenson, multiple laps Jenson
Shoot me down? ....
Well put TBY, although the 'brainfart' part I think is a tad harsh considering it was the poor chaps second season
Lewis wasn't napping...he was on the team radio.....this sleep talking guy was being told that both cars had to conserve fuel, Lewis told his engineer that Button was getting closer.....he was told that both cars the same.....& that JB would not overtake.
But he did, & LH didn't wait around to be told that they needed to conserve fuel, so he could not take the place back, he got right in there.
IMHO a sneaky move by JB.
After the race LH said nothing about it, he looked bemused...... or WTF is going on.
He actually said to his engineer on the radio...what the hell is going on....(I think)
I would still say if you somehow got constant wet conditions Hamilton would be better over a whole race distance, of course thats unlikely.
He won the title in an inferior car that year largely because he was much better in wet conditions than Massa. I have no doubt that had he followed the prevailing strategy in quali that day he'd have won the race, so I do think it was a little disappointing that they tried to be too clever.
Don't agree on that one. He was much better or the Mclaren was much better in wet conditions? Ferrari was awful in wet conditions during 08. Remember Massa his zillion time spin a silverstone.