Current Fernando Alonso

Suprised there's no thread (although I had one for his blogs), so i'll start off:

A double world championship vs Raikkonen and then Schumacher in 2005 and 2006 respectively elevated Alonso's status but, apparently, no one told his rookie teammate at his brand new team of a theoretical 'pecking order' the following season ... and the Spaniard was 'seen off' by the young Englishman, Hamilton, into two years of Wilderness while both Hamilton and an even younger Vettel began to make their mark through '08 and '09.

Arguably, Alonso was in the Top 3 of all the Formula One 'Aces' in the 2000s following Hakkinen's retirement - up there with either Schumacher/Raikkonen and, then, Raikkonen/Hamilton - and remains so in the early 2010s along with Hamilton/Vettel...with only Kubica knocking on the door until the Pole's horrible Rallying accident.

A question mark initially over 2004 during which Trulli lead him in the standing until the Italian fell out with ex-manager and team boss Flavio Briatore (Alonso's then business manager) under dubious circumstances after the French Grand Prix.

Another question mark is...Who has progressed more since the end of 2007: Hamilton or Alonso?

A fan. Then came the unfortunate blackmail allegations against McLaren boss Ron Dennis on the morning of the 2007 Hungarian GP which came to light at the highly costly FIA 'Spy-Gate' hearings before Spa...followed by the odour of the deliberate crashing of the Number 2 Renault car at Singapore in 2008 which lead to Alonso finishing 1st in the event and ended in the banning of Briatore and Pat Symmonds a year later.

2009 was a poor year with 'Nando's' mind likely on the prospect of Santander paving the way to better prospects at Maranello one year earlier.

2010 was a fresh start at Ferrari (who no longer had Schumacher walking through the premises regularly) but first half season mistakes ultimately cost him a title inspite of being infamously aided by a Team Orders switch w Massa at Hockenheim (which lead to more world-wide criticism).

Relatively fast, relatively consistent but prone to mistakes and a possible insecurity complex (*) based on wanting sole focus from a team and being only happy with a Number 2 in the other car running behind him. Anything else and it seemingly rattles him.

(*) This is my own personal opinion.

..and so to 2011...

He's underperformed only at Malaysia (hit Hamilton) and China (invisible while Massa challenged McLarens and Red Bulls) and, arguably, Canada...but has maximized his chances in the other 6 races culminating in the British GP win.

He said in his post-Monaco blog that 'Silverstone would be the WDC cut-off'...and so, after some major upgrades, the Ferrari looks a winner again. It might be too late for 2011 given Vettel's finishing rate...but the 2012 regs means they should keep the hammer down at Maranello.

He's signed on through to 2016...So hopes are high of a WDC at some juncture...but not yet.
 
Alonso has been very brave (or foolish) by making public his frustration with the Ferrari chassis. Ferrari don't like disloyalty, which Alonso must very well know! Do you think he wants' out of his contract, so he can go to RBR?
 
To be fair to Cappelli you could have had the ghost of Fangio himself in that 92 Ferrari and it still would have been a heap of junk.
 
Capelli didn't do well in 1992 though, even considering the awful car the Scuderia provided to him and Alesi. Not for nothing he was called, Ivan "the Terrible" Capelli.
 
Alonso has been very brave (or foolish) by making public his frustration with the Ferrari chassis. Ferrari don't like disloyalty, which Alonso must very well know! Do you think he wants' out of his contract, so he can go to RBR?
Saying Ferrari need a faster car isn't a show of disloyalty, Montezemolo has said the same and knows they'd be lost without Alonso. The whole story was exaggerated beyond belief and I think Montezemolo probably wished he had said far less. He certainly softened his comments when the press got their teeth into the story.
 
I don't think the issue was saying that the Ferrari wasn't quick enough, it was suggesting that he'd rather be driving someone else's car. But, as normal and particularly in downtimes, the media blow these things way out of proportion.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad you used the correct terminology sushifiesta, as there is a massive difference between a fast car and a quick car, for instance the Red Bull isn't a fast car but it is massively quick, and the McLaren is a fast car and yet it is sluggish, relatively speaking that is, it would still blow any of our minds away if we were allowed to drive it....
 
Q: (Andrea Cremonesi – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Sebastian, during the race we heard a little message radioed by you that you were complaining about the rear light on the Vettel car. I would like to know how disturbing, how annoying it was for you during the race?

SV: Me?

FA: Was the question for me? Well, it was...

SV: Will you listen now? You complained about the red light?

FA: Yeah, yeah. It was disturbing a little bit. Obviously it’s a very strong light with no rain.

SV: It’s worse in here.

FA: Sebastian is not used to having a car in front so he doesn’t know how it feels to have a red light on but when you are behind, a little bit close, it’s always flashing and sometimes you just have to touch one button because that’s the red light or something that you press by mistake, if he could switch, but he didn’t. So the whole race I had it flashing in my eyes.

SV: I was trying to get away so it wasn’t disturbing you so much.

FA: You didn’t...
 
In his F1 career (according to Autosport Plus), Michael Schumacher scored 1566 WDC points. Fernando Alonso's tot after Singapore is 1551. Meaning that thanks to the rubbish 25-point scoring system currently in effect, before the end of the 2013 season, Alonso likely will become the most points scoring driver in F1 history.

If all of F1 history were re-scored under the current system, Alonso would come 3° on the list with a bit less than 62% of MSC's score. Prost would be 2°, 77 points to the good of 'Nando but 1420 shy of Schumey.
 
Blog Zbod ... Unfortunately, this is how the statistics are collected! I mean, look at Fangio; the greatest of all time, winning approx 50% of all his races, yet never appears on the lists of most anything! (Except championships!)
 
Blog Zbod ..... Statistics such as those you've listed, and any other drivers results you can think of since the beginning of the sport we all love are meaningless due to the role technology plays. This is why you can never compare drivers of different era's with any accuracy. My favorite driver of all time is Sir Jackie for a variety of very valid reasons but its impossible to compare him with the drivers of today.
 
Back
Top Bottom