1997 was a long time ago Ray. Tmes change.
Anyone bringing up the Barrichello incident is just being disingenous, and they know it.
Anyone bringing up the Barrichello incident is just being disingenous, and they know it.
Why is it when it's always Hamilton it's always different? If it was said regarding to some other driver it would be deemed as normal.
the rules don't allow for hindering or destroying a competitors chances or taking revenge,
So what?? They clearly had no intention of ensuring Massa finished as high as possible and how dare they come out and use the terms 'ruined' and 'anger' after their very own driver was instructed to concentrate on destroying Hamilton's race!
And the fact that Hamilton destroyed his own race and it wasn't Massa?
Why is it when it's always Hamilton it's always different? If it was said regarding to some other driver it would be deemed as normal. Small team radio blown out of proportion?:
They were racing each other for position; destroying your competitor's race by deliberately holding them up around a street circuit is just racing. I don't get what the big stink is about. Was Massa supposed to let Hamilton by? Last I checked, drivers were supposed to hang onto a position like a dog hangs onto the postman's leg especially if it's on a street track.
Poor choice of words by Smedley, but it's not as if he meant "Destroy his car!!! Go on son!!!!"
Suzuka is coming up and this puts me in mind of Suzuka, 1997 when Irivine deliberately and brutally held and backed up Villeneuve, destroying his (JV's) race after letting Schumacher into the lead of the race and, effectively, the lead in the World Championship (which he lost eventhough he tried to brutally chop Villeneuve at the next/final race at Jerez).
We in Canada didn't moan about it because that's the way Ferrari operated.
Aggressive move?Massa and Hamilton were duelling for fifth place when the British star made a typically aggressive move on Massa into Turn 7.