Grand Prix 2012 Monaco Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

For the first time in 3 decades there have been 5 different winners in 5 races and it's not exactly been the status quo winning races as not many people would have had Rosberg and Maldanado winning this early in the season and after Australia not many people would have bet on Alonso winning before the start of the European season. This is also when drivers like Hamilton, Webber, Raikkonnen and Schumacher havent won this season and the way things are going there could be 8 winners after 8 races which could almost be unprecedented.

Indeed, one thing that 2012 has shown is that no one team has been consistently fighting for the win at all five 5 races, while Lotus have possibly had the most consistent pace of the top teams, problems in the first two races meant they were unable to be competing for the win while Kimi might have been unlucky to not come away with at least one win in Bahrain and Barcelona where strategy troubles robbed him the top step but two podiums have shown that he still has the pace despite being away from the sport for 2 years.

The big surprise of the weekend was a first victory for Maldonado and a first victory for Williams since the 2004 Brazilian Grand Prix, a win which was merited with no outside help apart from the disqualification of Hamilton from qualifying and the effect of this is unknown as to how the race would have been different but in the race Pastor drove the wheels off the car and did extremely well to keep a rejuvenated Fernando Alonso behind in an updated Ferrari on home soil. Considering Ferrari's early season struggles, for Alonso to be joint leading the Championship with Vettel is no mean feat at all.

The field is very tightly packed as well with the top 7 drivers being separated by 20 points, this time last year it was nearly 100 with Vettel claiming 4 of the first 5 races. This year that is not the case and for once Barcelona served up a classic which in my opinion was the best race of the season, finally there was close racing from 1st down to last with the outcome not being decided until the last few laps.

Going into Monaco there is no point prediction what the running order will be as the likelihood is it'll change again, for all we know the Force India's could suddenly be at the front and Lotus might only be fighting for points, it certainly makes for extremely fascinating viewing as no-one is dominating the Championship, in the city of the high rollers and casinos, it remains who will strike lucky in Monte Carlo and claim the big win, it will certainly not be boring, after all, if even Barcelona can provide an entertaining race, surely most places can (with the exception of Valencia!)
 
According to Paul Hembrey Pirelli are expecting the option tyre (Super Soft) to last for around 35 laps and the prime tyre (Soft) to last for around 50 laps with roughly a 1 second per lap difference in favour of the option tyre. In a 78 lap race you wouldn't be surpised if many people qualified on the option tyre and ran it in the first stint, then at around lap 30 switched to prime tyres and finished the remaining (48) laps. Although with this strategy you might be slow towards the end of each stint but as we saw last year in Monaco track position is king. Even if the tyres hit the cliff with a few laps left I wouldn't be surpised if a driver managed to maintain their position by accelerating slowly out of the important coners (such as Portier and Anthony Noges) that lead to the 2 main overtaking areas.
 
That for me is not racing.

Being able to hold up faster drivers simply because the circuit isn't wide enough and is enclosed by barriers is a poor excuse for a GP.
 
And yet it prove to be the most effective strategy.

Being fast and agressive are not the only aspects to racing. There are many skills involved such as tyre management, choosing who to fight and where, choosing the best strategy, playing to a circuits strengths etc.

Although it may not be exciting it is still racing (IMO). Of course this strategy will only work if a driver is able to defend well, overtaking has a lot of focus put on it nowadays but I also enjoy a tense battle with great shows of defensive driving (Hamilton and Webber's tussle in Korea last year was great).

I also think this may be one of the few occasions that a 'minow' (Caterham, HRT and Marussia) may score a point. However they would have to make a bold decision and perhaps switch from the options to the primes on lap 20 in order to gain enough track position.Taking this even further it would probably prove to be a most unpopular decision but a small team could try this strategy with both of their cars lying astern and could work in tandem to ensure that they were not passed. Granted it would take great skill (to not crash) and also great trust between the team-mates. I know this is an extreme strategy but after 2 years I really think this may be the only way they can actually engineer a points scoring position rather than simply 'lucking' into one. Or am I just being stupid?
 
Why would they be penalised? It wouldn't be sporting, perhaps, but I don't know of a rule or rules against that.
 
Also, that strategy assumes that the teams in front would ignore what the teams behind were doing! This is why we get a domino effect going up through the field when one car decides to stop - so the other teams try to close off their strategy option by pulling in the next lap! This will be particularly important at Monaco...
 
I rarely purchase the print version of Autosport as I subscribe to the online edition but I've had a few hours in hospital waiting rooms recently and whilst perusing the Monaco preview Autosport all I can say is that it's a Lewis Maldonado/Pastor Hamilton love in from all the experts.

Can't wait for the race although I have a love/hate relationship with Monaco, I have a feeling this might be a corker.
 
Agree Monaco isn't racing due to lack of passing. However, F1 is more like roulette than racing thanks to the idiots at Pirelli.
 
Batman don't blame Pirelli; they have actually done a very good job of producing tyres that did exactly what they were asked to by the FIA. If you don't like it, you should have a go at the FIA rather than 'shooting the messenger'.
 
Arggg...I came on here to say how annoying I find it about the constant conversations about whether the racing is "too unpredictable" and find we're still talking about it here too. Pirelli are an independent company to the teams and F1. They were given a specification and stuck to it. All this talk from people in F1 makes it sound like we are trying to engineer our sport. F1 shouldn't have so much say on what is a independent force in the sport, beyond the initial specification.

For a start, who would you take the win from. Mclaren clearly did the best job in Australia, Alonso and Perez drove a dream in Malaysia, China was very much a Mercedes circuit with the long straight, Bahrain Vettel drove one of his dominant races, with only Raikkonen perhaps doing a better job and then Maldonado shocked us all by comprehensively beating his teammate and the field.

Looking at the world championship standings, you'd have to say that the one thing that has happened above all else is the rise in importance of driver, which is the best thing from my pov, in the previously car dominated sport. The top 7 are the best 7 drivers in F1 at the moment, and the top 3/4 are the top 3/4. I don't see what is the problem, and F1 should be forced to let Pirelli get on with their job.
 
Back
Top Bottom