Grand Prix 2012 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

:bored:

At one stage of this season it looked like we could have had a Championship battle as close as 2010 if not closer, but after Sebastian Vettel's 4th victory in a row, it appears that he has a third title in three years in the bag. A determined second from Alonso limited the damage, but he has to finish ahead of Vettel at almost all the remaining races to take his own third championship, and at this moment in time, that appears very difficult with the pace of the Red Bull.

Despite the hype, India once again delivered an underwhelming race with Vettel taking his second win at the track and at a canter as he was rarely troubled throughout the race, only late troubles with the 'tea-tray' threatened to derail his victory but this was but a minor bump on the road and from looking a distant contender after an alternator failure at Monza but since then he's taken 100 points from 100 available to completely change the face of the Championship, it feels like 2011 all over again.

It shows how quickly F1 can change that until lap 23 in Singapore, it seemed like McLaren would take their 4th win in 4 races and that Hamilton would close the gap to Alonso and increase his chances of a second world title. But a gearbox failure and suspension problems (and astroturf) in Japan and Korea evaporated any chances he has and he looks forward to a fresh start at Mercedes next year. From having the quickest car at that point, it seems that McLaren were unable to stop the Red Bull onslaught that has pretty much wrapped the championship up in one sharp autumn burst, the only thing that can stop it is if Red Bull's reliability problems rear it's head again and I feel that this is Alonso's best chance of overhauling Vettel's ever increasing lead.

But Abu Dhabi is a track where Red Bull have been strong at, Vettel won in 2009 and 2010, and qualified on pole in 2011 but a first lap puncture prevented him from probably making that three wins in a row, however he might not have won in 2009 where Hamilton had to retire from the lead with brake problems. McLaren themselves have been strong here in the past with both Hamilton and Button on the podium for them in 2010 and 2011 (Button has been third every single year at the track as he finished there in 2009 for Brawn). But their championship hopes, both in the WDC and the WCC are over after a poor last 4 races which took them out of contention.

However, if 2012 has shown us anything, it's that nothing is certain. After Germany it seemed that nothing was going to stop Alonso from taking a third world championship and for various reasons, his formidable lead has been wiped out. The updates Ferrari made for recent races has ensured that he can fight for the podium, but he'll need extra if he is to take the title, whether Ferrari can do that or not remains to be seen, but after the mistakes of 2010 where they lost the title, they will not want to see another title slip through their grasp, another failure will not look good on Domenecali, and it is very probable that Luca de Montezemelo would see it as a failure if Alonso doesn't win the championship this year.

Abu Dhabi circuit write up - http://cliptheapex.com/pages/yas-marina-circuit/
 
He he! I've just worked out that if Hamilton were to win today and also the final two races, Alonso scored no better than one 10th and one 4th place, and Vettel failed to score again, all three would finish on 240 points.

Obviously Webber and Raikkonen might have something to say, but for this exercise I'm only considering the 'Big Three'.

Who would then be the champion?

Lewis (6 wins)
Runner up, Sebastien (5 wins)
Third, Fernando (3 wins)
 
gethinceri & The Artist.....
Oops, apologies and thanks. Missed that bit in 28.6(a). So that does after all mean that the ratios could be changed effectively with no further penalty if a driver has already been sent to the back, since 28.6(a) also states that the next event begins a new sequence of five, suggesting that the penalty cannot be carried over from one event to the next.
 
Horner insists there is enough fuel in the car for a sample, but it can't be obtained without removing bodywork, which is against the rules.
Which is a bit of an irrelevance anyway, as the regs say that the team is responsible for providing a means for that sample to be extracted. (see also http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/104004 ) So it doesn't matter one jot if the fuel was in there, if they didn't design the fuel cell in such a way that it was accessible.

Of course, that raises the intriguing possibility that the "fuel cell problem" affected their ability to extract the full 1 litre...
 
Chad Stewarthill, as I read it, they may only be changed if there is damage to those parts. Then he will get a 5-grid penalty, which doesn't affect him ofcourse. But if there's no damage, they can't be changed.
At each Event seals may be broken once, under supervision and at any time prior to the second day of practice, for the sole purpose of changing gear ratios and dog rings (excluding final drives or reduction gears). Competitors must inform the FIA technical delegate which ratios they intend to fit no later than two hours after the end of P2. However, one additional change of ratios and dog rings will be permitted if a gearbox change is necessary on the first day of practice before the end of P2.
Gear ratios and dog rings (excluding final drives or reduction gears) may also be changed under supervision for others of identical specification at any time during an Event provided the FIA technical delegate is satisfied there is evident physical damage to the parts in question and that such changes are not being carried out on a systematic basis.
Gear ratios may be changed once before 2nd day of practice.
Then may be addionally changed if necessary on the first day of practice.
Also they can be changed if there is damage.
 
It's confirmed then that Red Bull have changed both the gearbox and the ratios, resulting in two separate five place grid drop penalties.
They should have given him a new engine too.
 
I'm very aware of the complexities of the fuel tank, though I have nowhere near the knowledge of one of my friends who spent years fabricating them for F1 cars as well as World Championship Rally cars during the magical but extremely dangerous Group B era. His skills were very highly regarded in the US as well as Europe and were used for safety reasons alone as his work was considered failsafe. All I can add is if this is a fuel cell failure it would be the first we have heard of at this level and you can be sure the FIA would look at it very closely with regard to safety.
 
No different to any other driver at the back who is given further penalties; it has happened many times this season, mainly with the teams who usually find themselves at or near the back.
 
I always thought that kinda fishy and that penalties should be carried over. After all, if a penalty isn't a penalty, then who cares about it?
 
Does anyone else think this fuel cell business comes at an all-too convenient time to spice up the end of the season? It's not the first time mysterious yet significant events like this have happened...
 
Perhaps they should introduce a time-based penalty of, say, two seconds per grid place for penalties that would have taken the driver beyond last on the grid. So Vettel for instance would be held in the pit lane for 20 seconds (10 further penalty places x 2sec) after the last car had passed the pit lane entry line.
 
Back
Top Bottom