Blog Zbod
Podium Finisher
Sorry, my mistake. I was infected by the disinformazione from Ferrari's web site:Sorry to do this but a quick facts check is necessary.
Firstly it is not possible to build a 180° V configuration. Usual parlance in Blighty is either "Boxer" - as Olivier notes - or "Flat" as in "Horizontally opposed Flat 4" or "Horizontally opposed Flat 12" etc....
Apparently, so was Porsche, who seem to labour under the delusion they once built "a 180-degree V engine."
A boxer refers to a specific drive train architecture, one which has a separate crank pin for each piston, as in this 6-cylinder Porsche 911 crankshaft:
Six cylinders, six crank pins, the pairs of pins for opposing cylinders splayed at 180° intervals, which is the nuts and bolts of what facilitates its characteristic "boxing" countermovement:
Which is not the case with the 512 BB crankshaft, which has only half as many crank pins as cylinders...
...as does the crankshaft in the 12-cylinder Porsche 917, ...
...which means opposing cylinders must share a common crank pin, which precludes any "boxing." Unless something very expensive goes pear shaped.
Calling it simply a "flat" engine is a over broad and imprecise. An L-6 is also flat, it just happens to be stood on its side. I'm accustomed to hearing "boxer" and "horizontally-oppposed" used interchangeably, but even that is muddy because the cylinder bores in a 180° V tend to be more nearly perfectly aligned (i,e., "opposed") than those in a boxer. Which is why I choose to call a "flat" engine a "boxer" if it has boxer architecture, and a "180° V" if it doesn't. It leaves no ambiguity.
But the engine in the 512 BB, by Ferrari's own documentation, is not a boxer. I actually have expended some energy in the searching but have never uncovered a single instance of Ferrari ever building a boxer engine, not even un prototipo. Which is why I bothered to broach the topic in the first place.
Last edited: