Poll Out of ten - 2012 Brazilian Grand Prix

[mjo]

Well that was a good race. Vote only on entertainment, not on championship permutations.

 

[mjo]

Great race, apart from the underwhelming end.

 

[Boyle]

No 11?

 

[mjo]

Out of ten .

 

[chris1981]

fizzled out at the end but a great race overall!

 

[rufus_mcdufus]

What mjo said. Also disappointed for Lewis yet again, could've been different championship outcome if he'd stayed in the race.

 

[Greenlantern101]

3no. 10 out of 10's in a row.

Great end to the season.

 

[no-FIAt-please]

Great first half. Bit meh towards the end with the commentators trying to 'big it up'.

 

[FB]

8 from me. Enjoyed the result and edge of the seat stuff - not sure what would ever force a 10 out of me. Might change my avatar...

 

[f1fansp]

Amazing race; I didn't even mind who won out of Alonso/Vettel and don't normally like the changeable races, but that had so much, and I was nervous watching it.

Best moment: Raikonen getting lost and having to spin it out of the cul-de-sac

 

[Bill Boddy]

It was just as well that Raikkonen did go back, he might have been penalised for missing half a lap.

 

[Josh]

10. I wish this wasn't the last race of the season.

 

[Jen]

Another 9 from me - just wish these guys had the impetus to produce such racing earlier in the season.

 

[Boyle]

Another 9 from me - just wish these guys had the impetus to produce such racing earlier in the season.

They did, they just went to sleep for 4 or 5 weekends after the European season finished

 

[HansyRod]

A clear 10, comfortably best race of the season.

 

[jez101]

11 for me. Breathless.

 

[Jos the Boss]

10, that was amazing, worst part was the yellow flag finish, would have loved some green flags and Alonso sweep round the outside of JB, but it was a great GP overall

 

[gethinceri]

I love F1.

 

[Mephistopheles]

9 from me because 10 mean perfection and there is no such thing...

Edit

Who is that in your avatar FB

 

[FB]

http://cliptheapex.com/threads/explain-your-avatar.679/page-23#post-170338