No, it means they could not find any evidence, because there was none to find which means he made a mistake pure and simple.
Lack of evidence doesn't equal innocence. The perfect crime.
The victory dance and fist pimping in front of Hamilton was seemingly meant to provoke a reaction/non reaction and it worked. Whether Rosberg cheated or not, I feel Lewis should’ve had the clarity of thought to rise above it, having been in a similar situation before in years gone by. He might have felt strongly that Rosberg was fighting dirty Margarito style but he should’ve shaken hands and moved on.
So now it's proven guilty even though proven innocent I'm not sure I like that concept, someone mentioned a witch hunt and a ducking stool earlier that analogy is becoming more and more apt on here, or should I say lynch mob mentality....
witch-hunt also witch hunt(wÄch′hÅnt′)
n.
An investigation carried out ostensibly to uncover subversive activities but actually used to harass and undermine those with differing views.
lynch
lɪn(t)ʃ/
verb
- (of a group of people) kill (someone) for an alleged offence without a legal trial, especially by hanging.
overreact
verb
Get things out of proportion, go over the top (Brit. informal), blow things out of all proportion, make a mountain out of a molehill, get upset over nothing, react disproportionately
So now it's proven guilty even though proven innocent I'm not sure I like that concept, someone mentioned a witch hunt and a ducking stool earlier that analogy is becoming more and more apt on here, or should I say lynch mob mentality....