Current Fernando Alonso

Suprised there's no thread (although I had one for his blogs), so i'll start off:

A double world championship vs Raikkonen and then Schumacher in 2005 and 2006 respectively elevated Alonso's status but, apparently, no one told his rookie teammate at his brand new team of a theoretical 'pecking order' the following season ... and the Spaniard was 'seen off' by the young Englishman, Hamilton, into two years of Wilderness while both Hamilton and an even younger Vettel began to make their mark through '08 and '09.

Arguably, Alonso was in the Top 3 of all the Formula One 'Aces' in the 2000s following Hakkinen's retirement - up there with either Schumacher/Raikkonen and, then, Raikkonen/Hamilton - and remains so in the early 2010s along with Hamilton/Vettel...with only Kubica knocking on the door until the Pole's horrible Rallying accident.

A question mark initially over 2004 during which Trulli lead him in the standing until the Italian fell out with ex-manager and team boss Flavio Briatore (Alonso's then business manager) under dubious circumstances after the French Grand Prix.

Another question mark is...Who has progressed more since the end of 2007: Hamilton or Alonso?

A fan. Then came the unfortunate blackmail allegations against McLaren boss Ron Dennis on the morning of the 2007 Hungarian GP which came to light at the highly costly FIA 'Spy-Gate' hearings before Spa...followed by the odour of the deliberate crashing of the Number 2 Renault car at Singapore in 2008 which lead to Alonso finishing 1st in the event and ended in the banning of Briatore and Pat Symmonds a year later.

2009 was a poor year with 'Nando's' mind likely on the prospect of Santander paving the way to better prospects at Maranello one year earlier.

2010 was a fresh start at Ferrari (who no longer had Schumacher walking through the premises regularly) but first half season mistakes ultimately cost him a title inspite of being infamously aided by a Team Orders switch w Massa at Hockenheim (which lead to more world-wide criticism).

Relatively fast, relatively consistent but prone to mistakes and a possible insecurity complex (*) based on wanting sole focus from a team and being only happy with a Number 2 in the other car running behind him. Anything else and it seemingly rattles him.

(*) This is my own personal opinion.

..and so to 2011...

He's underperformed only at Malaysia (hit Hamilton) and China (invisible while Massa challenged McLarens and Red Bulls) and, arguably, Canada...but has maximized his chances in the other 6 races culminating in the British GP win.

He said in his post-Monaco blog that 'Silverstone would be the WDC cut-off'...and so, after some major upgrades, the Ferrari looks a winner again. It might be too late for 2011 given Vettel's finishing rate...but the 2012 regs means they should keep the hammer down at Maranello.

He's signed on through to 2016...So hopes are high of a WDC at some juncture...but not yet.
 
There's no comparison Mephistopheles, In Alonso's case and the same applies to anyone in his position, two concussions only three or so weeks apart can ruin a persons life as they get older. I'm sure no one would want to see Alonso with deteriorating brain function through suffering a second concussion, that could have been avoided by waiting a few extra weeks. Having two concussions is not the problem it becomes a serious problem when they're close together.
 
He had a bang on the head people are being cautious about him driving for a few weeks end of.. Jeez this is getting boring...

----------------------------------------------------------

So it is. Driver gets a knock on testing and and is advised to rest, thus missing the first race. On the face of it, absolutely nothing there out of the ordinary. Yet in this case the incident's gone viral all over the net giving rise to an unbelievable litany of conspiracy theories competing for most irrelevant and absurd ones of the lot.

It's just that McLaren's management must shoulder the blame for misjudging the age we live in and could be said to have treated the story-hungry media with splendid contempt, first of all by waiting a good 48 hours after the incident to inform us that the crash had been caused by an unpredictable gust of wind (nothing particular unusual about that in itself, what with the delicate aero balance of these cars with their huge downforce loads but does it really take 48 hours for a team to reach and impart that conclusion?), then by speaking of a "low-speed crash" (which the published telemetric data has now revealed to have taken place at close to racing speed) then by quoting doctors' statements mentioning the need to "avoid a second concussion" a few days after Ron Dennis claimed Alonso "didn't even have" one to begin with...

The various conspiracy theories might be a load of old baloney but McLaren certainly helped giving rise to them!
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry that Nando will not be competing at the series opener. If only because he can 'get the best' from any car and would help to move McLaren forward and, possibly, to a competitive position for the rest of the season.

I doubt that this is a political/contractual stance on Nando's behalf; nor a misdirection by his Ronship (although his blatherings haven't helped). More likely the medical profession cover their backs in terms of possible legal suits.
 
I'm sorry that Nando will not be competing at the series opener. If only because he can 'get the best' from any car and would help to move McLaren forward and, possibly, to a competitive position for the rest of the season.
Just maybe all that is true Jen but what he can't do is stop it breaking down, also we have absolutely no idea how competitive the McLaren chassis is at this time...
 
Indeed.

Do we know that the chassis is at fault or is it the engine; or maybe both?

Nando and Jens can point up whatever inadequacies there might be and it is a shame that one driver will be missing for the first outing.
 
The story regarding Alonso's memory loss has been reported way beyond the British tabloids. The first paper to print the story was El Pais who are very close to Alonso's management and The Times have been reporting on his condition also.
There are now teams threatening to boycott Melbourne unless McLaren can provide evidence he didn't receive a shock from the car that contributed to the accident. Some of the teams clearly lack confidence in the hybrid power units.
 
Apologies for jumping in a bit late here on this topic. But is there any doubt that if the McLaren looked even semi-competitive that Fernando would be raring to go in Oz. I mean the McLaren doctors have definitively said that Alonso is physically fit for racing.

I don't question the fact that his medical team and family would have legitimate concerns about him getting back in a race car next weekend, but I believe the overriding factor in the decision is the (apparently) uncompetitive car.
 
FB.....I couldn't actually give a shit either to be honest. I just read the article and I'm intrigued as to which teams would bother to boycott. They either trust their own cars or not.
 
If (at least some of) the teams decided to boycott the opening race, leading to cancellation or, at best, a repeat of the 2005 US Grand Prix farce, imagine the dire consequences to the sport. It is already on a downward spiral as far as viewership, both at-track attendance and television audience goes.
 
Back
Top Bottom