Current Fernando Alonso

Suprised there's no thread (although I had one for his blogs), so i'll start off:

A double world championship vs Raikkonen and then Schumacher in 2005 and 2006 respectively elevated Alonso's status but, apparently, no one told his rookie teammate at his brand new team of a theoretical 'pecking order' the following season ... and the Spaniard was 'seen off' by the young Englishman, Hamilton, into two years of Wilderness while both Hamilton and an even younger Vettel began to make their mark through '08 and '09.

Arguably, Alonso was in the Top 3 of all the Formula One 'Aces' in the 2000s following Hakkinen's retirement - up there with either Schumacher/Raikkonen and, then, Raikkonen/Hamilton - and remains so in the early 2010s along with Hamilton/Vettel...with only Kubica knocking on the door until the Pole's horrible Rallying accident.

A question mark initially over 2004 during which Trulli lead him in the standing until the Italian fell out with ex-manager and team boss Flavio Briatore (Alonso's then business manager) under dubious circumstances after the French Grand Prix.

Another question mark is...Who has progressed more since the end of 2007: Hamilton or Alonso?

A fan. Then came the unfortunate blackmail allegations against McLaren boss Ron Dennis on the morning of the 2007 Hungarian GP which came to light at the highly costly FIA 'Spy-Gate' hearings before Spa...followed by the odour of the deliberate crashing of the Number 2 Renault car at Singapore in 2008 which lead to Alonso finishing 1st in the event and ended in the banning of Briatore and Pat Symmonds a year later.

2009 was a poor year with 'Nando's' mind likely on the prospect of Santander paving the way to better prospects at Maranello one year earlier.

2010 was a fresh start at Ferrari (who no longer had Schumacher walking through the premises regularly) but first half season mistakes ultimately cost him a title inspite of being infamously aided by a Team Orders switch w Massa at Hockenheim (which lead to more world-wide criticism).

Relatively fast, relatively consistent but prone to mistakes and a possible insecurity complex (*) based on wanting sole focus from a team and being only happy with a Number 2 in the other car running behind him. Anything else and it seemingly rattles him.

(*) This is my own personal opinion.

..and so to 2011...

He's underperformed only at Malaysia (hit Hamilton) and China (invisible while Massa challenged McLarens and Red Bulls) and, arguably, Canada...but has maximized his chances in the other 6 races culminating in the British GP win.

He said in his post-Monaco blog that 'Silverstone would be the WDC cut-off'...and so, after some major upgrades, the Ferrari looks a winner again. It might be too late for 2011 given Vettel's finishing rate...but the 2012 regs means they should keep the hammer down at Maranello.

He's signed on through to 2016...So hopes are high of a WDC at some juncture...but not yet.
 
For once I have to agree with Brundle who says that the whole Alonso thing "doesn't add up".

I also find it deeply ironic that Manor is more likely to be on the track here in Australia than Alonso is. Who would have thought that possible?
 
Maybe Alonso has decided he doesn't want to drive a car that can only do a handful of laps and so is going to sit back and wait until the car is fixed and when it is Kmag will be out on his ear again..
 
I am starting to wonder if Alonso didn't have a mini-stroke like my brother-in-law did a few years back. That would more readily explain the enforced time off than what is being put out in the press releases.
 
The Australian GP is three weeks to the day after Alonso suffered concussion. That is the normal stand down period for most sports. Obviously his doctors feel that missing the Australian GP will give him a five week gap since his accident, that makes a hell of a lot of sense in case he was involved in another accident. I think some people are reading a lot more into this than there is which is probably McLarens fault for not being open about the accident in the first place.
Alonso will be back for Malaysia and all this will be left in the past.
 
Last edited:
I am starting to wonder if Alonso didn't have a mini-stroke like my brother-in-law did a few years back. That would more readily explain the enforced time off than what is being put out in the press releases.
His scans were normal. A mini stroke would have shown in his scans as a small bleed, they didn't.
 
Having been looking up racing regulations to work on a story, Titch is right on the money. Having a stroke would be a big problem from a licensing standpoint, because it means you'll likely fail the various intensive health checks that are required to get the racing license. I'm going with it being a run of the mill concussion treated cautiously and with the proper stand down.
 
If concussed it makes sense to skip Australia. Maybe not if he was a legitimate championship contender but his chances of scoring points were slim to none.
 
Errm, a quote from Lord Dennis of Woking CBE CDM

The technical definition of a concussion you can see in a scan. The possibility is that the change of direction happened so fast that it was actually like a sort of whiplash of the brain. It didn't actually touch anything, it didn't bruise, didn't bleed… it is a medical situation. I am not trying to conceal anything. It is not appropriate for me to talk about it. I'm just telling you the facts. He is physically perfect with no damage whatsoever. No concussion, no nothing … He had symptoms at one stage, but nothing that shows.
Read more at http://en.espnf1.com/mclaren/motorsport/story/192643.html#Rs1gIOp1hR2UuLRJ.99

From here: http://www.espn.co.uk/mclaren/motorsport/story/192643.html
 
His scans were normal. A mini stroke would have shown in his scans as a small bleed, they didn't.

A concussion would show on a scan too, yet they are claiming the scans were "normal". Someone isn't telling the truth.

If Alonso isn't driving in the second race, I think that will be a strong indicator that his driving days are over. I hope that isn't the case.
 
siffert_fan ..... A concussion doesn't always show in a scan, other obvious symptoms indicate a concussion has occurred. Although there are various levels of seriousness with concussion doctors always err on the cautious and treat any concussion as potentially serious. They also consider the patients lifestyle and future risk based on that lifestyle
I had a brain scan three months ago and it was explained to me that a scan doesn't always provide the answers relating to concussion.
 
Back
Top Bottom