By my reckoning its only Mercedes, Williams and HRT still to announce their launch dates. Makes me think they are all going to be late for the first test.
Also Mercedes announced a while ago that they won't go to the first test, so it won't surprise me if they unveil their car just before the second test.
Mclaren didn't run at the first test last year and spent the rest of the year chasing a very fast Redbull you have to say its not looking like Mercedes fortunes are going to change for 2012 if they are this far behind before the season starts.
They obviously should of stopped developing the 2011 car earlier and got some work done on this years car.
I think Brawn car was talked about earlier - yes it missed loads of tests but lets remember that Honda and Ross Brawn sacrificed the 2008 season to develop the 2009 car - so whilst the name had changed and they'd bunged a Merc engine in the back of it by the time that Brawn car tunred a wheel in its so called first test it had been in development for over a year with plenty of testing at the Grand Prixs. Brawn was no dummy - the only reason he bought in was because he knew it was going to win. apparently with the honda engine in the car was 2 seconds a lap faster!
and no Mclaren didn't but there also didn't ahve the pace of the front runners - you're right in the no scenario is the same but I think its failry safe to say that in F1 history the more tested a car is the better its perfomance has been!
Yep but considering the changes they had to do to fit the Mercedes engine in, then obviously reliability issue will creep in. The car was built for a Honda engine, not a Mercedes one.
I don't think fititng a bullet-proof engine like the Merc into a well tested and bullet-proof designed car woould have created reliability issues if the parimeters were right but i could be wrong.
It could create weight and performance issues as the car would have been designed for something completely different (and it did - 2 seconds a lap slower) but I don't see how a new engine would suddenly make a car componunt unreliable along as the change had been accounted for.
The McLaren MP4/4 was incredibly late in arriving. There isn't necessarily any correlation between debut date and performance or reliability, it's a question of how efficiently the time (developing or testing) is being used in each case.
The teams that are going to the first test with the new car aren't necessarily falling behind, it's a tradeoff between devopment time and data collection from the new car and the new tyres. A lot of data can still be taken from the tyres and you can simulate the type of downforce levels you think you will achieve, but this is risky.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.