So the day is near, the holders of the 2018 (and 2022) World Cups will be decided on Thursday. However, they are overshadowed (hopefully) by allegations made by Panorama about FIFA voters taking bribes from ISL in the 1990s, Jack Warner's continued touting of tickets in 2010 and the ridiculous guarantees FIFA requires from a World Cup host.
This column from the Observer's article history has a few interesting snippets about FIFA's past.
I'm hoping that FIFA decide to award the World Cup to somewhere else (Russia), as I feel that England should not be a World Cup host. I choose the word host to conjure up images of FIFA the parasite; its demands with regard to tax breaks and labour laws are ridiculous, and it is baffling that so many nations put up to this affront to sovereignty to host what is essentially a football tournament.
In addition, it is not the United Kingdom's role to act as the railroad for the gravy train for such corrupt and odious individuals as Warner, Blatter and the various hangers-on thereof.
The economic benefits of the tournament are exaggerated by the assumption that FIFA will not bleed its host dry, as it has done in the past. South African street vendors were banned from the street near 2010 World Cup stadia, and I have no reason to suppose that those trying to sell drinks made by Pepsi, for example, will not be intimidated should a 2018 World Cup be held here.
Lets hope the World Cup goes somewhere where a corrupt government deserves to be in thrall to a corrupt attachment of international cretins for a while. Russia, for example.
This column from the Observer's article history has a few interesting snippets about FIFA's past.
I'm hoping that FIFA decide to award the World Cup to somewhere else (Russia), as I feel that England should not be a World Cup host. I choose the word host to conjure up images of FIFA the parasite; its demands with regard to tax breaks and labour laws are ridiculous, and it is baffling that so many nations put up to this affront to sovereignty to host what is essentially a football tournament.
In addition, it is not the United Kingdom's role to act as the railroad for the gravy train for such corrupt and odious individuals as Warner, Blatter and the various hangers-on thereof.
The economic benefits of the tournament are exaggerated by the assumption that FIFA will not bleed its host dry, as it has done in the past. South African street vendors were banned from the street near 2010 World Cup stadia, and I have no reason to suppose that those trying to sell drinks made by Pepsi, for example, will not be intimidated should a 2018 World Cup be held here.
Lets hope the World Cup goes somewhere where a corrupt government deserves to be in thrall to a corrupt attachment of international cretins for a while. Russia, for example.