Ironic that because they refused to release Fallows to AM they are caught over spending.. someone should have flagged that to themjust watching teds Notebook & he says that Red Bull 4 reasons for why they are above the budget cap but it wasnt on the car are
- Catering (Appartantly as mad as it sounds that is correct)
- They didnt include a tax rebate because they said they didnt know how much it would be & that refund wouldve put them under
- Unused inventory that they say FIA changed their rules on half way through the season
- Dan Fallows being on Gardening leave ahead of his move to Aston Martin
Knowing Adrian Newey he is already working hard on making sure all the downforce has been captured before the restrictionsCan some of the more techy members help me out with the severity of the wind tunnel penalty?
Wind tunnels didn’t pick up porpoising for instance.
yeah toto wolff has said he can pinpoint when this season went wrong & it was in november when they saw the windtunnel figures & the ground effect seal they thought they had so build around it. but didnt take into account the bumpy circuitsWind tunnels didn’t pick up porpoising for instance.
Can some of the more techy members help me out with the severity of the wind tunnel penalty?
The restriction on wind tunnel time is definitely the most painful punishment imposed on Red Bull by the FIA. the team is the world champion among the constructors, it already had to settle for less wind tunnel time, namely 70%. The 10% penalty will be added to that, so Red Bull will have to make do with 63% wind tunnel time next year
Without punishment, Red Bull Racing's wind tunnel time in 2023 would amount to 224 runs, but the additional restriction imposed by the FIA reduces that number to 202 runs. In doing so, it will have to cut back considerably on the competition: Ferrari is allowed 240 runs, Mercedes 256. The restriction is valid for a period of 12 months from the date of the concluded agreement. That means the limit is valid until 26 October 2023