Current Alpine F1 (Formerly Renault)

Lotus Renault GP

FIA Entry: Renault F1
Car 9: Nick Heidfeld
Car 10: Vitaly Petrov
Engine: Renault V8
Team Principal: Eric Boullier
Technical Director: James Allison
Race Engineer Car 9: Simon Rennie
Race Engineer Car 10: Ayao Komatsu

Stats at end 2010

First Entered 1977
Races Entered 285
Race Wins 35
Pole Positions 51
Fastest Laps 31
Driver World Championships 2
Constructor World Championships 2

Team History

Renault first entered F1 as a constructor in 1977 at the British Grand Prix. At the height of the “garagiste” and Cosworth engines Renault entered a single car, driven by Jean-Pierre Jabouille, powered by a 1.5 litre turbo charged engine. Renault’s experiment with turbo charging probably changed F1 more than any other single event in the sport’s history.

Jabouille won Renault's first Grand Prix in 1979 in France and, up until their withdrawal as a constructor from the sport in 1985; Renault won 15 Grands Prix. They continued in F1 as an engine manufacturer until in 2002 they returned as a constructor having acquired the Benetton (formerly Toleman) team in 2000.

The “new” Renault Team

For 2002 Renault partnered Jarno Trulli and Jenson Button together and the team managed 4th place in the Constructors Championship. Button was dropped for 2003 in favour of the team’s test driver, Fernando Alonso. Alonso repaid the team’s faith by winning the Hungarian Grand Prix, the first win for a Renault car since 1983.

Jarno Trulli won the Monaco Grand Prix in 2004 but was replaced by Jacques Villeneuve before the end of the season as he and the team principal, Flavio Briatore, fell out amid claims of favouritism toward Alonso.

The Championship Years

Giancarlo Fisichella was brought in to replace Trulli for 2005 and duly won the first race in Australia. Alonso won the next 3 and a total of 7 in the season to win the Drivers World Championship and give Renault the Constructors’ Title they had long waited for; breaking Michael Schumacher 5 year run of driver's titles and and Ferrari's 6 year long strangle hold on the constructors title.

In 2006 the same pattern repeated, Fisichella took a single victory, Alonso 7 along with both the Drivers Championship and the Constructors Title.

Post Alonso (part 1)

Alonso’s departure to McLaren in 2007, replaced by rookie Heikki Kovalainen, left the team without a star driver to build around and the team struggled. Kovalainen outscored his more experienced team mate but a highest finish of 2nd in Japan was the best result on the track. The team finished 3rd in the Constructors Championship but as McLaren were disqualified from the championship in 2007 the result flatters to deceive.

After falling out with McLaren Alonso returned to Renault for 2008. Rebuilding around him, the car slowly improved and Alonso won races in Singapore and Japan. It later transpired that Alonso’s team mate in 2008, Nelson Piquet jnr, had deliberately crashed during the Singapore race with the collusion of team principal Briatore and Technical Director, Pat Symonds. This emerged in 2009 after Piquet was dropped by the team for Roman Grosjean resulting in Briatore and Symonds being banned from the sport and Renault being given a 2 years suspended ban.

2009 was a lean year for Renault. Alonso managed pole in Hungary but otherwise a single 3rd place in Singapore was the best placing the team could muster. The resulting bad publicity surrounding the race fixing allegations resulted in many of Renault’s major sponsors withdrawing finance from the team and put into question Renault’s continuing presence as an F1 team.

Post Alonso (part 2)

Alonso left for Ferrari in 2010 and Robert Kubica took his place, partnered by Russia’s first F1 driver Vitaly Petrov. At this time Renault sold a 75% share of the team to Luxembourg based venture capital company Genii. Renault continued to provide technical support and engines to the team. Kubica managed some podium places through the season whilst Petrov took some time to acclimatise to F1 with a best finish of 5th in Hungary, matching Renault’s finish in the Constructor’s Championship.

2011

For 2011 Renault sold it’s remaining 25% share to Lotus cars resulting in a change of team name to Lotus Renault GP causing a legal battle with Team Lotus as to who had the rights to use the name Lotus in F1. Renault will also race under a British licence this season leaving F1 without a French team for the first time since 1975.

Renault planned to retain the same driver line up but Kubica crashed in a rally car prior to pre-season testing and has been replaced by former team mate Nick Heidfeld. They will use the R31 chassis.
 
RasputinLives

Is this different from Infiniti which Red Bull are carrying on their cars

Loads of Mclaren staff jumped to Red Bull for money previously before that

They also have owners who aren;t really willing to put money into the team to avoid building such large debt. This will have to be paid back first if they do try and cash in on the assets

Raikkonen&Redbull=PartyTime
Its fair to say all the people leaving Enstone are doing it because they have better job security elsewhere and more money
 
Bushi
That was the idea of the resource restriction agreement but it is believed Red Bull are not operating within the agreement and left FOTA because of it but also it means they can spend whatever they like now
 
Lotus claim they spent "seven figures" developing the disallowed LWB chassis, money down the drain. And they're abandoning the double-DRS because it's only good for 0.2-0.4 secs a lap, which is insufficient to close the gap to Red Bull.

Auto Motor und Sport is reporting they have "tens" of unpaid engineers, and that Kimi has threatened to sue the team over his unpaid wages. Lotus denies it but other sources say Boullier is deliberately withholding his money until the end of the season. Sunday they went another half million Euros in debt to him because of the points bonus he earned at Singapore. Ever since he announced the move to Ferrari, the Lotus management only have been communicating with him via text messaging. And today they have announced they would be willing to change the name of the team to 'Renault' ...if Renault will pay them for it.

I for one would be happy to see the ACBC marque in the hands of someone with at least a vestigial connection to Hethel.
 
Last edited:
Lotus claim they spent "seven figures" developing the disallowed LWB chassis, money down the drain. And they're abandoning the double-DRS because it's only good for 0.2-0.4 secs a lap, which is insufficient to close the gap to Red Bull.

That is just idiotic, if it works, stick it on the car! Instead of wasting two seasons trying to get it to work then shelving it.
 
Rumours circulating that Enstone are about to sign a deal with a Bahrain oil company and that if Grosjean keeps good form the team are going to plump for Felipe Nasr from GP2 as it will land them a nice plum sponsorship deal with Banko De Brazil.

All of which pushes Hulkenberg towards Mclaren all the more.

Whilst Nasr has not shown Hulkenberg qualities he is a pretty talented youngster to bring in if you get cash as well. He has a great junior record and if they could pump some killer instinct into him then he'd be a class driver. Max Chilton he ain't!
 
How many races has Nasr won in GP2 this season? His teammate has won two whilst still needing at least one more year in the series.
 
Nasr has won a grand total of no GP2 races ever! He is amazingly consistant with his podium finishes though which is a rareity in GP2 and why he is just about in the title fight still whilst his team mate is well and truely out of it.

Like I said he's not on Hulks level but he's a smart driver with some pace. He just needs rounding off a bit.
 
Probably but the nature of GP2 is that if you get to your third year you're seen as having "had your chance" and got engulfed by others clamouring for seats. Look at Valsecchi etc. The nature of the feeder series now is throw them in feet first.

I'd rather see Nasr having a year trying to find his feet at Enstone than see him not make F1 at all like it looks is going to happen for poor old Sam Bird.
 
Interesting comment that Bouillier made that he ideally wants a driver to build for 3 or 4 years over a driver who is short term ie 1 season and take a punt on who is available next year again

Apparently the driver pairing will not be announced until their money situation is sorted

Having Nasr makes sense to get sponsors from Brazil and it will keep BErnie happy who is trying to get Massa to stay so there is still appeal to Brazil
 
Thats what I mean Il_leone. Nasr is talented too and I'd rather see him come in now a year too early than miss his chance and be eternally frustrated like poor old Sam 'Max Chilton got a drive but I didn't!?!' Bird.
 
Seems like Valsecchi will soon be a forgotten man

Which fits in with my stuff on GP2. I agree with Bill Boddy that Nasr and a lot of the GP2 names need more time but look what happens when you do? The general reaction by most who aren't avid followers of GP2 (i.e. the sponsors looking to invest) to Valsecchi is "It took him 4 years to win GP2 and he's in his late 20's!?!? He must be crap"

Its the price drivers are paying for the sport having a sudden run of ever younger superstar champions.
 
RasputinLives

the same happened to poor Pantano who actually had an impressive junior record and then it fell apart making an ill fated move to Jordan and he spent 3 years before winning GP2 but by then he was thought to be washed up for F1
 
I fear the name Leimer or Bird will be added to that list.

Meanwhile Nasr and Caledo who will come 3rd and 4th in the championship and would gain from another year in the series will prob have F1 seats next year.
 
Back
Top Bottom