Current Alpine F1 (Formerly Renault)

Lotus Renault GP

FIA Entry: Renault F1
Car 9: Nick Heidfeld
Car 10: Vitaly Petrov
Engine: Renault V8
Team Principal: Eric Boullier
Technical Director: James Allison
Race Engineer Car 9: Simon Rennie
Race Engineer Car 10: Ayao Komatsu

Stats at end 2010

First Entered 1977
Races Entered 285
Race Wins 35
Pole Positions 51
Fastest Laps 31
Driver World Championships 2
Constructor World Championships 2

Team History

Renault first entered F1 as a constructor in 1977 at the British Grand Prix. At the height of the “garagiste” and Cosworth engines Renault entered a single car, driven by Jean-Pierre Jabouille, powered by a 1.5 litre turbo charged engine. Renault’s experiment with turbo charging probably changed F1 more than any other single event in the sport’s history.

Jabouille won Renault's first Grand Prix in 1979 in France and, up until their withdrawal as a constructor from the sport in 1985; Renault won 15 Grands Prix. They continued in F1 as an engine manufacturer until in 2002 they returned as a constructor having acquired the Benetton (formerly Toleman) team in 2000.

The “new” Renault Team

For 2002 Renault partnered Jarno Trulli and Jenson Button together and the team managed 4th place in the Constructors Championship. Button was dropped for 2003 in favour of the team’s test driver, Fernando Alonso. Alonso repaid the team’s faith by winning the Hungarian Grand Prix, the first win for a Renault car since 1983.

Jarno Trulli won the Monaco Grand Prix in 2004 but was replaced by Jacques Villeneuve before the end of the season as he and the team principal, Flavio Briatore, fell out amid claims of favouritism toward Alonso.

The Championship Years

Giancarlo Fisichella was brought in to replace Trulli for 2005 and duly won the first race in Australia. Alonso won the next 3 and a total of 7 in the season to win the Drivers World Championship and give Renault the Constructors’ Title they had long waited for; breaking Michael Schumacher 5 year run of driver's titles and and Ferrari's 6 year long strangle hold on the constructors title.

In 2006 the same pattern repeated, Fisichella took a single victory, Alonso 7 along with both the Drivers Championship and the Constructors Title.

Post Alonso (part 1)

Alonso’s departure to McLaren in 2007, replaced by rookie Heikki Kovalainen, left the team without a star driver to build around and the team struggled. Kovalainen outscored his more experienced team mate but a highest finish of 2nd in Japan was the best result on the track. The team finished 3rd in the Constructors Championship but as McLaren were disqualified from the championship in 2007 the result flatters to deceive.

After falling out with McLaren Alonso returned to Renault for 2008. Rebuilding around him, the car slowly improved and Alonso won races in Singapore and Japan. It later transpired that Alonso’s team mate in 2008, Nelson Piquet jnr, had deliberately crashed during the Singapore race with the collusion of team principal Briatore and Technical Director, Pat Symonds. This emerged in 2009 after Piquet was dropped by the team for Roman Grosjean resulting in Briatore and Symonds being banned from the sport and Renault being given a 2 years suspended ban.

2009 was a lean year for Renault. Alonso managed pole in Hungary but otherwise a single 3rd place in Singapore was the best placing the team could muster. The resulting bad publicity surrounding the race fixing allegations resulted in many of Renault’s major sponsors withdrawing finance from the team and put into question Renault’s continuing presence as an F1 team.

Post Alonso (part 2)

Alonso left for Ferrari in 2010 and Robert Kubica took his place, partnered by Russia’s first F1 driver Vitaly Petrov. At this time Renault sold a 75% share of the team to Luxembourg based venture capital company Genii. Renault continued to provide technical support and engines to the team. Kubica managed some podium places through the season whilst Petrov took some time to acclimatise to F1 with a best finish of 5th in Hungary, matching Renault’s finish in the Constructor’s Championship.

2011

For 2011 Renault sold it’s remaining 25% share to Lotus cars resulting in a change of team name to Lotus Renault GP causing a legal battle with Team Lotus as to who had the rights to use the name Lotus in F1. Renault will also race under a British licence this season leaving F1 without a French team for the first time since 1975.

Renault planned to retain the same driver line up but Kubica crashed in a rally car prior to pre-season testing and has been replaced by former team mate Nick Heidfeld. They will use the R31 chassis.
 
So Valsecchi gotba run for 16 laps in the car today due to Kimi's hangoverillness. He says he found out 15 mins beforehand and all his race gear was in Australia so he had to use Kimi's seat, race suit and boots. Everything but his underwear apparently.

He seems very confident after just 7 flying laps and says he's confident he could get top 6 finishes already. Whether he emphasised the word finishes and glared at Grosjean when he said it can not be confirmed.
 
It comea accross a bir cocky doesn't it. He also says that after the test ge's confident that if Kimi could get third he could get 6th and that he's sure he'd eventually be competing for wins.

Could be the press has picked his words to make a story, could be a bit of bravardo because he knows he won't have to prove it. I sense a slight bitterness that he won GP2 and didn't land a drive.
 
It's also giving away the cars positioning, that's the way I saw it.

I quite like Valsecchi, I hope he gets a drive.
 
He seems very confident after just 7 flying laps and says he's confident he could get top 6 finishes already. Whether he emphasised the word finishes and glared at Grosjean when he said it can not be confirmed.

I don't think that's what he actually said after reading the article.

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8537075/Valsecchi-Sixth-to-Kimi-s-third

If Kimi finishes third, I am ready enough to finish sixth

In my opinion he's comparing his performances to Raikkonen, it may still appear as arrogant though, but was interesting to read that article and why he got no drive compared to the other GP2 runners from last year.

No money, and is unlikely to get any sponsors due to the bad economy in Italy, while the others have some major backing.
 
Yes that article has phrased everything slightly different to the one I read. Goes to show you have to be careful.
 
i was surprised to see Valsecchi did not land a drive in F1 despite being Gp2 champion.. only other GP2 champion was Giorgio Pantano

Still people seem to forget Raikkonen signed a 2 year contract with Lotus so if he has a bad season you never know if he could forced out as well especially if money considerations came into it as well

So it is not only Grosjean who has to watch his seat at Lotus
 
Unless Grosjean starts compeating with the big boys I do not see Kimi getting the boot especially for Valsecchi. Would you replace a race winning world champion with a rookie? Especially if you're a team on the way up.

Now Kimi may decide to go to Red Bull but if they drop him for Valsecchi I will buy a hat, cover it in gravy and eat it.
 
RasputinLives

Anything can happen in F1 off course Grosjean improving is definitely one thing that needs to happen

Kimi says he is not driving for money because his salary is very low compared to what he has been use to but then again he does harbour driving for Ferrari or Mclaren should they be interested ... I can see Mclaren more possibly if they offer more money

Plus we know Lotus team ownership issues over money because they have not got a title sponsor this year along with uncertainty over the engines it is a lot to think about the teams future for Kimi to weigh up about its potential
 
I think your dislike of the Enstone team cloud your views sometimes. Valsecchi has no cash so he wouldn't be the one coming in even if I believed they were that desperete for the cash.
 
Il_leone,

I would think that having Kimi on board greatly increases their chances of acquiring a title sponsor vs just having Grosjean and Valsecchi in the saddle.
 
RasputinLives

I only dislike the Enstone team because of Flav that..

There has been stories about power struggle between the owners and the team it seems like 3 distinct divisions the F1 team, Genii Capital and the Proton Group and apparently some engineers were not going to work until they got paid suggests it is not a happy camp but they manage to keep it under wraps


I am saying if Kimi demands more cash because of his status --- the team could not afford his Ferrari inflated wages or his rally wages paid by Red Bull as it were and then Valsecchi may get a chance because he is cheap initially..the testing the other day would have helped

as for getting more sponsors because of Kimi ... I am not sure many sponsors would back a team because Kimi is not a marketing type person unless you're Red Bull
 
Well Flav has had nothing to do with them since 2009 and I'm sorry but if I'm a big investor and I had a choice between investing in a team with a household named former world champion who'd shown he had the ability to drag the car higher than it should be or a team that was fielding some unknown Italian bloke who may or may not be able to compeate in F1 then I know who I'd go for.

You seem very doom and gloom about a team that had its best season in years last year and seem to be on the same pace at least in testing.
 
I think that the problem with Lotus last year was that on the circuits they were good then they were very good, but there were too many circuits where they seemed to be poor.
 
Back
Top Bottom