Current Alpine F1 (Formerly Renault)

Lotus Renault GP

FIA Entry: Renault F1
Car 9: Nick Heidfeld
Car 10: Vitaly Petrov
Engine: Renault V8
Team Principal: Eric Boullier
Technical Director: James Allison
Race Engineer Car 9: Simon Rennie
Race Engineer Car 10: Ayao Komatsu

Stats at end 2010

First Entered 1977
Races Entered 285
Race Wins 35
Pole Positions 51
Fastest Laps 31
Driver World Championships 2
Constructor World Championships 2

Team History

Renault first entered F1 as a constructor in 1977 at the British Grand Prix. At the height of the “garagiste” and Cosworth engines Renault entered a single car, driven by Jean-Pierre Jabouille, powered by a 1.5 litre turbo charged engine. Renault’s experiment with turbo charging probably changed F1 more than any other single event in the sport’s history.

Jabouille won Renault's first Grand Prix in 1979 in France and, up until their withdrawal as a constructor from the sport in 1985; Renault won 15 Grands Prix. They continued in F1 as an engine manufacturer until in 2002 they returned as a constructor having acquired the Benetton (formerly Toleman) team in 2000.

The “new” Renault Team

For 2002 Renault partnered Jarno Trulli and Jenson Button together and the team managed 4th place in the Constructors Championship. Button was dropped for 2003 in favour of the team’s test driver, Fernando Alonso. Alonso repaid the team’s faith by winning the Hungarian Grand Prix, the first win for a Renault car since 1983.

Jarno Trulli won the Monaco Grand Prix in 2004 but was replaced by Jacques Villeneuve before the end of the season as he and the team principal, Flavio Briatore, fell out amid claims of favouritism toward Alonso.

The Championship Years

Giancarlo Fisichella was brought in to replace Trulli for 2005 and duly won the first race in Australia. Alonso won the next 3 and a total of 7 in the season to win the Drivers World Championship and give Renault the Constructors’ Title they had long waited for; breaking Michael Schumacher 5 year run of driver's titles and and Ferrari's 6 year long strangle hold on the constructors title.

In 2006 the same pattern repeated, Fisichella took a single victory, Alonso 7 along with both the Drivers Championship and the Constructors Title.

Post Alonso (part 1)

Alonso’s departure to McLaren in 2007, replaced by rookie Heikki Kovalainen, left the team without a star driver to build around and the team struggled. Kovalainen outscored his more experienced team mate but a highest finish of 2nd in Japan was the best result on the track. The team finished 3rd in the Constructors Championship but as McLaren were disqualified from the championship in 2007 the result flatters to deceive.

After falling out with McLaren Alonso returned to Renault for 2008. Rebuilding around him, the car slowly improved and Alonso won races in Singapore and Japan. It later transpired that Alonso’s team mate in 2008, Nelson Piquet jnr, had deliberately crashed during the Singapore race with the collusion of team principal Briatore and Technical Director, Pat Symonds. This emerged in 2009 after Piquet was dropped by the team for Roman Grosjean resulting in Briatore and Symonds being banned from the sport and Renault being given a 2 years suspended ban.

2009 was a lean year for Renault. Alonso managed pole in Hungary but otherwise a single 3rd place in Singapore was the best placing the team could muster. The resulting bad publicity surrounding the race fixing allegations resulted in many of Renault’s major sponsors withdrawing finance from the team and put into question Renault’s continuing presence as an F1 team.

Post Alonso (part 2)

Alonso left for Ferrari in 2010 and Robert Kubica took his place, partnered by Russia’s first F1 driver Vitaly Petrov. At this time Renault sold a 75% share of the team to Luxembourg based venture capital company Genii. Renault continued to provide technical support and engines to the team. Kubica managed some podium places through the season whilst Petrov took some time to acclimatise to F1 with a best finish of 5th in Hungary, matching Renault’s finish in the Constructor’s Championship.

2011

For 2011 Renault sold it’s remaining 25% share to Lotus cars resulting in a change of team name to Lotus Renault GP causing a legal battle with Team Lotus as to who had the rights to use the name Lotus in F1. Renault will also race under a British licence this season leaving F1 without a French team for the first time since 1975.

Renault planned to retain the same driver line up but Kubica crashed in a rally car prior to pre-season testing and has been replaced by former team mate Nick Heidfeld. They will use the R31 chassis.
 
It seems to me that, through all the adversity, the former Renault team have done and are doing a fantastic job of maintaining thier integrity, quality and status as a competitive team. It is extremely admirable how they have dealt with the situation since crash gate. I see a long and bright future for them ad a return to winning ways under thier current management. There is a long road to travel but they appear to be travelling it well.
 
It seems to me that, through all the adversity, the former Renault team have done and are doing a fantastic job of maintaining thier integrity, quality and status as a competitive team. It is extremely admirable how they have dealt with the situation since crash gate. I see a long and bright future for them ad a return to winning ways under thier current management. There is a long road to travel but they appear to be travelling it well.


As long as no more senior engineers leave the team they;ve had an exodus of them

the other concern is what engine the team will use given that their current deal expires at the end of next season with Renault who said they were only looking to support two teams in the past and Red Bull currently are the factory Renault team.

as I've said there seems to be a bit of uneasiness about Genii capital and the team at Enstone especially in the past they've asked for the money from the constructors championship early to build the next season car

It seems Lotus will have to fight on less resources against the big 4 teams to stay at the front which could hurt them again later in the season like last year
 
I agree with you Ninja, the environment of constant owner changes, controversies and new team names must have had an effect on the Toleman boys, but they're still building decent cars.
 
I agree with you Ninja, the environment of constant owner changes, controversies and new team names must have had an effect on the Toleman boys, but they're still building decent cars.

the team's progress is somewhat dependent on what finance assistance they get from Genii capital who seem to work on a smaller budget than the top 4. Their results were not as good last year because Kubica actually masks the performance of the car in 2010 and it showed when the team went backwards they struggled mid 2011 . That is why there was some frustrations with Heidfeld

They can build decent cars but they will always fall back due to a lack of development
 
In 2008 and 2010 they didn't fall back, infact they probably improved as the season went on.

In 2008 there is no doubt about it, but thats not really the timeframe we're considering, but they did hold on to the pace of development in 2010 pretty well.

Their results were not as good last year because Kubica actually masks the performance of the car in 2010

To an extent, but it was still a decent car. Kubica didn't shine when plonked in the abysmal BMW of 2009, so there's only so much any driver can do.
 
In 2008 there is no doubt about it, but thats not really the timeframe we're considering, but they did hold on to the pace of development in 2010 pretty well.



To an extent, but it was still a decent car. Kubica didn't shine when plonked in the abysmal BMW of 2009, so there's only so much any driver can do.

Hate to differ but he could have won Melbourne if he did not crash with Vettel and his performance in Brazil was exceptional because he was down on power and still got 2nd in 2009... they were more impressive than Heidfeld's despite being outscored

2010 Kubica made Lotus/Renault better than they should be . The three tracks he was most impressive Spa, MOnaco and Suzuka where they are real driver tracks and got in amongst the front runners.. that is what Heidfeld could not do last season so that is why he was dropped

2010 the Renault was a half decent car but not really one that was quick enough to challenge for podiums

EJ wanted to see what Kubica could have done with Renault last season before his crash because the testing suggests he was going to be a real threat
 
Hate to differ but he could have won Melbourne if he did not crash with Vettel and his performance in Brazil was exceptional because he was down on power and still got 2nd in 2009... they were more impressive than Heidfeld's despite being outscored

Yeah, but BMW had OK pace at Melbourne & Sepang but really went off the boil from China to around Spa, where they improved again.
 
that is what the BBC were a bit flummoxed by given they can see he was slipping and sliding/....

New tyres like Webber had last year was 2 seconds quicker so a bit of a strange decision from Lotus...but that is why Kimi's brain does not work well and showing a bit of rustiness possibly
 
All is not well with Kimi and Renault if you believe this article.

Coming into the Monaco weekend - the track with the tightest corners on the calendar and therefore the one requiring the greatest amount of steering lock - Kimi had further requested a high-ratio steering system, giving greater lock for a given degree of steering wheel input.

The Enstone guys readily agreed, even though designing and manufacturing such a system is a time-consuming business. It drained factory engineering effort away from a lot of other projects for around three weeks. As has been well-reported,Kimi made a single out-lap in Thursday morning practice at Monaco, came in, declared that the car was undriveable with this steering, almost totally devoid of feedback.

Re-fitting the conventional system is a 1.5-hour job and he was asked to consider running the session with it as it was, so that the standard system could be fitted in between sessions. He refused and took no further part in that session - the only one in which extended dry track running could have been made, as it turned out. With the afternoon session rained out, the team was sorely bereft of useful tyre data.

The lack of dry running was almost certainly a contributory factor in a qualifying performance from Kimi that one senior team engineer described as 'poor'. His lack of pace in the race came largely from the early deterioration of the rear tyres in a car that is usually among the very gentlest on the rubber - and that almost certainly came from the set-up arrived at amid a lack of extended dry running on Thursday. The team was less than impressed.

http://www1.skysports.com/formula-1/news/22058/7784961/Raikkonen-trying-Lotus-patience
 
I never took Kimi for a Diva although I also never considered him as particularly technically gifted when it came to how to set an F1 car up. Wonder why the much vaunted simulator wasn't used to test this out before wasting so much time? Maybe these things are as good as the teams make out.
 
What goes around comes around I suppose, the team has cost him several positions, points and effectively 2 wins this season.

Although not great behaviour from him by all means, should have at least gave feedback.
 
It would appear Lotus are having problems with their DDRS system.
Once again they tested it at Suzuka in first practice but have decided to run the rest of the weekend without it.

Considering how few races are left this season and devices such as this are banned for next season, they might as well can it.
 
From my understanding the Lotus system won't actually be included in the ban next year. Though it's referred to as DDRS in the media, it has no attachments to the rear wing unlike the Mercedes system and neither does it stall the front wing so it's within the proposed 2013 regulations.

http://somersf1.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/lotus-e20-passive-f-duct-system.html

I remember Mercedes testing their DDRS system at Suzuka last year, so perhaps the 2013 Lotus car will be designed around their 'f-duct' system. It's pretty interesting innovation if they can manage to actually tune it to activate at certain speeds.

Edit: Just browsing through SomersF1 site and he posted more on it:
http://somersf1.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/lotus-mercedes-drd-drag-reduction.html
 
Perhaps the wording in the FIA code needs to stop anyone using a "fully enclosed" space to redirect the air flow? Would put an end to all the silly pipes and tubes which are going to appear over the next few years.
 
Back
Top Bottom