Grand Prix 2019 Bahrain Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

On the surface a triangle is a simple 3-sided shape. At some point in our education we learn that all of a triangles interior angles add up to 180’. Then the mathematics gets a little more complicated as various theories and concepts are added in to the mix. Most of us give up at that point as the reason or purpose for all this understanding is lost on us.

Some of us carry on in education and take up careers in engineering where, among many of its individual disciplines, the triangle takes on a new importance. From mechanical to structural and even electronic engineering, the maths and science surrounding this simple three shaped side, is used to develop everything from buildings to cars and complex electronic circuits.

In vehicle engineering the triangle plays an important role in the early formula one cars as the prime shape of its space frame. The frame is made up of sections of tubular structures formed from triangles. These tetrahedral truss’s form some of the strongest man-made structures since the shape is rigid and light weight relative to the materials used in its construction.

The first true space frame chassis appeared in the 1930’s and, like many other aspects of vehicle design, mirrored ongoing work in the aerospace industry. After the second world war, sports car makers such as Maserati, Porsche and Jaguar launched vehicles with space frame technology. Small British sports outfits such as TVR and Lotus followed the trend and soon, space frame technology found its way into motor racing.

While the monocoque replaced the space frame by the end of the 60’s, triangle shapes still play a key role in F1 cars, with body panels and suspension components still carrying this distinctive shape right up to the present day.

That triangular journey to the present day, didn’t start in the 1930’s. The history of the triangle dates back thousands of years. Its history spans cultures, people and the globe on a journey of scientific development the is far greater than its humble shape would have you believe. We tend not to dwell too much on the origins of things that we see every day. You don’t imagine that triangles and the science around them would have a beginning.

The most basic principles of a triangle are wrapped up in Pythagorean Theorem. Named in honour of the great Greek mathematician Pythagoras. In simple terms it’s written as a2+b2=c2 or, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

Of course, triangular structures long predate Pythagoras. As an example what is the primary shape of the Pyramids of Giza? There is a great deal of evidence that the understanding of Pythagorean theory existed long before the man himself, even if it wasn't as well recorded.

This is where the culture of maths enters the story. The principle use of maths in the earliest periods of its development was for the study of astronomy. One of the cultures at the forefront of this research was the Islamic faith. Far from being the stereotypical people that we read about today in various right-wing papers and see misrepresented on our TV screens in one way or another, while many people in Britain were daubing their faces with plant dyes and charging at other people with pointy sticks, Islamic scholars had created the foundations for the scientific principles that frustrate and confuse school children across the globe today.

The word Trigonometry derives from the Greek words Triangle and Measure. Without the mathematical functions that this science gives us engineers in the pitlane would not be able to calculate huge amounts of data related to the speed and performance of a range of systems on their cars.

Sumerian astronomers studied the ratios between angles and circles and later, Babylonians discovered links between these ratios and types of triangle. The Greco Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy created the first trigonometric tables known as a table of chords. These tables were used across the growing world for the next 1200 years until more accurate tables could be produced. By the 10th century Islamic scientists were using all 6 trigonometric functions and were applying them to all sorts of geometric problems. The Persian mathematician Nasir al-Din al-Tusi has been described as the creator of Trigonometry as its own mathematical discipline and the first person to move trig fully away from astronomy and to create the mathematical uses that we still apply to problems in the present day.

So, when you watch the Bahrain GP, keep in mind that our scientific understanding of the world and the science that we see applied in almost every aspect of the GP we are watching, from the cars to the construction methods used in the steel stands that the race goers are sat on, owe a huge debt to the work of Islamic scholars who applied themselves to the puzzles of the world, thousands of years before.

Enjoy the GP.
 
True, very shocking!!!!...as we are dilligently entertained by probably the best sport in the world, oblivious to the fact...

Actually I do remember vaguely about the unrest... but did'nt realised the extent
 
Actually I do remember vaguely about the unrest... but did'nt realised the extent

I’m glad to see the Guardian article although it deserves to be in the main section of the newspaper, not just the Sport section. The extent of the repression is conveniently ignored by our government and most of the press. As a nation we are continually complicit in allowing it to continue, and it’s been really bad since early 2011 after the first ‘Arab Spring’ type Bahraini protest.
 
It doesn't matter, it's the Middle East, if the down trodden get power then they will commit atrocities on those that now commit them, they either come under the Iran style Islamic State or the present Sunni State, neither is better or worse than the other, it'a just their way of life. Should F1 refuse to support a Bahrain GP then they will be accused of supporting the other side a no win situation.
 
I’m talking about fair reporting - not supporting - of the situation in a country that has its ruling elite intrinsically linked to F1. Honest reporting creates awareness, which is clearly lacking with regards to Bahrain. It does matter, it’s the Middle East.
 
but i touched upon it before i went on a tangent about my views on Jean Todt. track i think 6 of last 7 have been pretty good. but i dont like racing in Bahrain, after the cancelled race we shouldn't have gone back until its properly safe, not deemed safe by people with self interests. but this is Bernie we are talking about fantastic successful businessman until his greed took over & bahrain money talked because they wanted to be on the map but then we would have a race in North Korea if kim jong il had put up enough money
 
thinking also even though it big weekend for Bottas, Ferrari & Gasly

Bottas - if he can win the race. if not win beat Hamilton or push hamilton quite hard if he loses & prove it wasnt a flash in the pan. then he can get himself into mix as championship contender. because at the moment still wouldnt bet money against hamilton

Ferrari - who wouldve thought that 2nd race of the season was almost must win & they need to find their "testing" pace back & challenge for pole again. because if they leave Bahrain still 7 tenths off in qualy & 50secs off in the race. could be a rocky season

Gasly - we all know how ruthless red bull can be if you dont deliver & sometimes even when you do. he just has to ask Kyvat, Buemi, Vergne, Alguersari, another Q3 absentee & finishing 11th he wont last long
 
I love the fact Gasly had one duff race an he is already for the chop. I suspect if Bottas had been bad the media wouldn't have focused on him so much.
 
reason I say about gasly is many things he hardly blown everyone away like Verstappen or Vettel did to get that promotion, he was alright in GP2 & maybe harsh but only got the F1 drive on 3 good races last season. then there is the expectation. then there is the race for the last 2 years if you are in a top 3 team then reliability providing you will finish in the top 6 whether you started at back or spun to the back. he finished 11th couldnt overtake his sister team & was fortunate because he could been futher down as Norris & Perez were held up by giovinattzi tyres & Red Bull history they didnt think twice about dropping kyvat out of senior team & then F1 within a season wasnt it
 
Yea, I don't think P1 one means much. For example, both Vettel and Hamilton were .3 seconds slower than the less heralded teammates. That will not last in either case. It is clear that neither top driver was pushing the car to the limit. Added to that, Mercedes ran medium tires while Ferrari ran soft tires. Furthermore, FP1 was warmer than the qualifying or race temperatures (as they are run in the evening)...so I suspect no one was pushing yet. FP2 will be a lot more informative (and maybe more informative than FP3).

I do note that Sainz (McLaren), Hulkenberg (Renault) and Kvyat (Toro Rosso) and Kimi (Sauber) all nicely established themselves. Hulkenberg and other drivers are saying that the Haas cars are faster than them, so we may have a good fight for 7-10th on the grid and in the points. I gather Racing Point is in the mix also. We do, sadly, know where Williams stands.
 
So, using the Freedom World Table from Freedom House this is how the various countries on the F1 calendar stack up. 1 is total freedom 7 is North Korea. More than a few dodgy countries for us to get vexed about.

View attachment 12453

The full list and methodology can be found here - Freedom World 2018 Table of Country Scores

There are certainly five countries on that list that are a big enough issue that F1 should be concerned: Bahrain, China, Azerbaijan, Russia and Abu Dhabi. Some of these are worse than others (even though they are all rated 6.5). China has run over protestors with tanks and still maintains some large camps. With Russia journalists and political opponents are sometimes killed, even overseas, in addition to the Sudetenland-like territorial seizures. Yet they get to host F1, Olympics and World Cups and things like that. Has anyone on this forum refused to buy products made in China because of their political repression?

In some these other cases, having F1 there actually does (begrudgedly) force the governments to behave better. Does a grand prix in Bahrain provide visibility to the repression (that would otherwise be ignored by the world)? Is engagement with the outside world a source of reform and change, as opposed to isolating them?
 
Back
Top Bottom