Grand Prix 2014 Australian Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

24 years old. Apprenticeship fully served, and finally arrived in one of the two seats that you've been working towards sitting in for years; that of the quadruple reigning champions. And to start with, your home Grand Prix. All you need is for the car and engine combination to maintain its previous stratospheric standards...

At time of going to press, testing has shown little sign that Daniel Ricciardo's dream will be realised. Although, it has to be said, at time of going to press, testing has not been quite as indicative as it could have been. We don't know who is going to be fast and we won't know until the lights go out in Melbourne.

Ricciardo's team-mate, paradoxical pantomime villain and quadrakaiser Sebastian Vettel is going for his tenth race win in a row, although early suggestions are that his assault on double figures might not be as straightforward as some of the previous nine. At Jerez, getting to double figures in terms of laps was a struggle..

Ricciardo will have to make sure he performs well this season to make sure he keeps the dream seat ahead of Daniil Kvyat, presuming the young Russian puts Jean-Eric Vergne's F1 career to sleep in a dignified and respectful ceremony.

Lotus, meanwhile, have very little money, necessitating the parachuting in of Scrooge El Duck as their driver to back up 2012's other panel-beater Romain Grosjean. Their nose looks rather different to anything else out there, and is closest in design to Williams' 2004 walrus nose. Which doesn't save the fears.

McLaren and Mercedes will back up their silver cars with a British World Champion, a Mercedes engine and a plethora of team principals. Button is, of course, the Melbourne specialist. They've got some running in at Jerez; it is unknown whether either are quick, but neither are stationary.

Fernando Alonso's Ferrari hegemony is about to be challenged by Kimi Raikkonen's arrival. Raikkonen won in Australia last year, so he's got form, and this race will be the first to tell us if Ferrari team radio this year will be a story of two passionate racers abusing their engineers, or two old men moaning about their backs.

Sauber's driver line-up is the most boring thing in Formula One since the US Grand Prix of 2005.

Nico Hulkenburg gets ready for his third consecutive last year before he is signed by a big team. A poor Force India will lead to the Hulk crying himself to sleep, while team-mate Sergio Perez comforts him with stories about how McLaren isn't all it's cracked up to be.

Williams have an interesting partnership; Felipe Massa released from the suffocating stranglehold of the Alonso anaconda and partnered with an almost-ripe pretender in Valteri Bottas. They have a new old livery, a new sponsor and new hope. Williams-Mercedes still doesn't sound right.

And, hey, the 2014 Australian Grand Prix has to be the best chance for Marussia and Caterham to actually score a point; only 9 of the other teams' engines need fall apart and 6 of them are made by Renault! Race finishing expert Max Chilton could be the beneficiary. Although he could actually finish 11th if there are only 10 finishers.

So, all that's left to talk about is Melbourne itself. Despite the rugby and cricket last year, the Grand Prix itself has been quite Pommie friendly in the last several years! The yellow lines at the edge of the track bordered by green walls have been a sign of F1 starting for a number of years, and there has been good racing backed up by poor reliability. And, boy, do we expect poor reliability...
 
:(

His Ronness has got to be happy.

Two records broken by rookies today then. The beginning of the new era...
 
Looks like Red Bull have serious problems
The team stated that based on the difference observed between the two
readings in P1, they considered the fuel flow sensor to be unreliable. Therefore,
for the start of the race they chose to use their internal fuel flow model, rather
than the values provided by the sensor, with the required offset.

(from the verdict: http://184.106.145.74/f1-championsh... Australian Grand Prix 2014 Document - 56.pdf )

If I understand it correctly, Red Bull didn't trust the readings of the sensor, even though it was tested between practice and race because it gave erratic reading. So RBR decided to trust on their fuelflow management. If the sensor falls withing the margins, then apparantly the fuelflowmanagement of RBR is not working properly. Didn't Vettel have problems with that as well?

Maybe they took a risk with Ricciardo, but didn't want to take that risk with Vettel, but neither worked very well.
 
What is the point of even watching a race when, time after time, officials step in and alter results hours after the race finished? Might as well just read the results in the next day's news.

I have always thought that something should have to be egregious for officials to get involved. Clearly that is not the case.
 
Last edited:
Looking at the full transcript of the decision wasn't just about the sensor, it was because they didn't seek FIA approval. Think it'll stand in this case.
 
Having read the stewards report there are two major problems.
1. By ignoring the fuel feed, they broke the rules
2. By ignoring the technical delegate mid-race, they further breached the rules.

This is sounding very like BAR in 2005... I shouldn't be surprised if this is not the last we hear of this. Personally, I wouldn't have appealed if I was Red bull!
 
Looks like Red Bull have serious problems


(from the verdict: http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f1-2014/f1-2014-01/Formula One Australian Grand Prix 2014 Document - 56.pdf )

If I understand it correctly, Red Bull didn't trust the readings of the sensor, even though it was tested between practice and race because it gave erratic reading. So RBR decided to trust on their fuelflow management. If the sensor falls withing the margins, then apparantly the fuelflowmanagement of RBR is not working properly. Didn't Vettel have problems with that as well?

Maybe they took a risk with Ricciardo, but didn't want to take that risk with Vettel, but neither worked very well.

"We had an issue with the sensor that changed its reading through Friday practice. We were given a replacement but that failed during qualifying. "We were asked to put the one we used on Friday back on the car and apply an offset. We didn't feel it was correct."

From above, it appears the FIA told them to apply an offset but they didn't because they disagreed with the readings. I can't see how an appeal is going to be successful if this was the case and also if it is proven that other teams had similar issues and followed FIA's directive.
 
To me, it is just one more example of the over-regulation of Formula one. The amount of fuel that can be used in a race is set by rules. Why regulate fuel flow rates as well? If they flow too much for too long, they run out of fuel. What part of that don't they understand?

If someone can come up with a way to go race distance with greater fuel flow rates than others without using too much fuel, THAT might be a technology that would be of value in the everyday world. Of course, that presupposes that F1 gives a rodent's rump about contributing anything to the real world, rather than being mere entertainment.
 
Oh dear Red Bull, only the first race of the season and that perceived attitude that the rules apply to everyone else has reared it's ugly head already. I feel very sorry for Ricciardo but pissed off with Red Bull. I like to see a GP result stand, is that too much to expect Mr Horner. >:(
 
Last edited:
The teams themselves helped draft the rules so let's not pretend as if this is some FIA witch-hunt. Regulations regarding fuel flow rate and usage have been written explicitly for a reason.
 
Last edited:
Kewee
Every team would make use of appealing the stewards decision in that situation, it is 18 points that could decide the world championship.
It is their right and they should make use of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom