Does that whole thing mean that Tavo Hellmund has a right to hire a circuit and force F1 to race on it, interestingly? Could we be seeing Indianapolis or Road America or somewhere?
As I understand it, there is a contract between Bernie and Tavo for Tavo to organise the race. Quite how specific as to where the race is, I don't know.
Then there is McCombs' company that has bought the land and paid for the building work. The crucial question is what contract exists between McCombs and Tavo.
It would seem bizzarre in the extreme that we got this far without any such contract, but the way everyone is behaving suggests that we might have done?
I wondered if Tavo could take his contract to New Jersey but it seems that Bernie has done a deal with Leo Hindery and co. If they have done their job a bit better than the other lot, they may have clauses preventing a competing race any closer than Austin for example.
Tavo may not be able to move it also because of the safety checks and the unwritten rule that Tilke has to be involved may also scupper him. Tilke are a big loser in this as they have now got to try and recover their costs from McCoombs for the unfinished circuit.
Apparently the circuit owners hadn't a clue who they were dealing with here. Now that Bernie's got his race on the East Coast I don't think he really cares about Austin. And quite frankly, neither do I.
Epstein and Co. obviously didn't know the rules of the game when they got into this and now they're going to be left holding the bag. Rather embarrassing and short sighted.
Sounds like you think it's dead? Maybe it is... it's hard to see Tavo and McCombs make up, it's hard to see Bernie now working directly with McCoombs, even if Tavo were to sell the rights, even if Bernie were to allow him to do so... Stopping the work was the nuclear option, with mutually assured destruction?