Sounds like the way the USF1 site behaved while they were conking out!I was wondering what was going on. Having visited the two websites regularly throughout the year it was noticeable that neither were being updated with any kind of regularity and indeed there have been no new photo's of the actual site for months.
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2011/...firms-new-jersey-race-threatens-austin-event/There is a lot going on behind the scenes in Austin, Texas at the moment with threats from all sides that the 2012 Grand Prix might not take place.
And this afternoon Susan Combs, who controls the finances for the State of Texas, has confirmed that the recent announcement of a rival race in New Jersey for 2013 is a “concern” and said that the first $25 million the state had earmarked for the project will no longer be available before the first event has taken place.
I thought this paragraph of the report was interesting as well:
"Local observers on the website of the Austin Statesman newspaper raise doubts about whether it was ever the sport’s intention to race in Austin and that it was a tactic to get the prize they really wanted, which was the New Jersey race with the Manhattan skyline as a backdrop."
Hmm, "the sport's intention" ? Now which "sport" would that be? Bernie?
Whatever happens, all it has done is further damage F1 in America.
Well done to all concerned.
And if anybody knows anything about Texas politics, this shouldn't come as much of a surprise.
Does that whole thing mean that Tavo Hellmund has a right to hire a circuit and force F1 to race on it, interestingly? Could we be seeing Indianapolis or Road America or somewhere?