I would like to thank Lewis Hamilton for making this thread possible. Because without Lewis Hamilton's overtaking move on Nelsinho Piquet at Hockenheim in 2008, this would be a foregone conclusion.
That second place, already standing out like a sore thumb on the record of the usually woeful Piquet, was achieved despite a complete lack of any reason why Piquet drove any better than the 18 drivers behind him, due to a strategy gamble that paid off. The rest of his career, save for an excellent 4th place at Fuji, was so bad that him deliberately crashing a car was written off because he crashed so often.
So in the absence of Piquet's win, which driver can call himself a Grand Prix winner more by luck than judgement. Who, amongst the 102 Grand Prix winners, never had a good performance in his career, including his victory.
I'll open the floor on this one, there would be a discussion on Most Undeserved World Champion, but other factors come into play.
That second place, already standing out like a sore thumb on the record of the usually woeful Piquet, was achieved despite a complete lack of any reason why Piquet drove any better than the 18 drivers behind him, due to a strategy gamble that paid off. The rest of his career, save for an excellent 4th place at Fuji, was so bad that him deliberately crashing a car was written off because he crashed so often.
So in the absence of Piquet's win, which driver can call himself a Grand Prix winner more by luck than judgement. Who, amongst the 102 Grand Prix winners, never had a good performance in his career, including his victory.
I'll open the floor on this one, there would be a discussion on Most Undeserved World Champion, but other factors come into play.
Its Jacques Villeneuve.