I voted "yes" but I meant to vote "no", for pretty much the reasons Galahad and others stated...
http://www.gtspirit.com/2011/02/12/2010-record-sales-year-for-ferrari/
Ferrari has had an exceptional year in terms of sales. The Italian sports car maker sold a record number of cars in 2010. This was mainly due to strong demand from Asia, but also the recovery of the market in the United States contributed to it. Ferrari sold 6,573 sports cars in total. That is 5.4 percent more than in 2009 and the highest number ever. The previous record year was 2008.
Especially in Asia, there was “exceptional growth”, said the car maker. In China, nearly three hundred Ferrari cars were sold, an increase of 43.6 percent. In the Middle East Ferrari had 349 buyers.
In the United States a record number of people – 1576 in total – bought a prancing horse. North America accounts for 26% of sales. Within Europe 467 cars were sold in the UK.
Would it not hurt Ferrari more than it would hurt F1 though?Some interesting posts in this topic.Most of the posters on here are dedicated F1 fans and have a much greater knowledge of F1 than most.
We have all heard this from Luca before and are getting somewhat tired of hearing the same points reiterated now virtually every year.
But it is important to remember that F1 is a global sport.If you asked he same question in say Brazil, or any of the Asian countries I very much suspect that the opinions they would put forward would be rather different.
If you take into account Ferrari's record 2010 road car sales which is a different aspect I know. But its clear from these figures that Ferrari does have a strong presence in the new F1 venues.
If Ferrari did pull out of F1 it would hurt without doubt.But it it wouldn't kill it.
I think it fair to say F1 wouldn't be a better place without them; but no team or individual is bigger than the sport despite what Bernie might think.It would certainly stifle debate in various forums if Ferrari were to leave! Who would be the next ' bad guy'?
I would actually miss them and would feel that F1 would be somehow 'lacking' without their presence! Who knows why, I don't but I might come back to you on that once I've thought it through.
Would it not hurt Ferrari more than it would hurt F1 though?
Would folk not say that Ferrari; the biggest, most experienced team in F1, with the biggest budget and arguably the best driver couldn't win anything so left the sport after unsuccessfully getting a rule change in their favour?I very much doubt it would hurt Ferrari.They have been around far to long and are almost a byword for high performance cars.
Would the brand name of Ferrari not get significantly less exposure if not in F1 for 20 odd races/year?
A sweeping and inaccurate statement methinks. For one, when I was a schoolboy I was enamoured with Porsches and German cars still have a place in my heart.Ferrari are ... every school boy's dream car
When I was a school boy many, many moons ago, my dream car was never a Ferrari. I had two dream cars, both equally unattainable. One was a genuine, gleaming red AC Cobra owned by a local Vauxhall dealer, which was usually to be found sat in his showroom (but very occasionally seen and heard burbling through town), the other was a Triumph TR6. After those it would have been a 'Persuaders' style Aston Martin DBS.A sweeping and inaccurate statement methinks. For one, when I was a schoolboy I was enamoured with Porsches and German cars still have a place in my heart.