Dunno, but it's fair to argue and contrast based on performances but its not his fault who his dad is. That's going to add a shed load of pressure.
There have been plenty of drivers over the years who have had less successful lower formula careers and made it into F1 or had outstanding lower formula careers and never had a sniff of an F1 seat.
F1 is only "the pinnacle of motorsport" because dear old Bernie created that image. F1 is, and remains, a class of motorsport for a certain type of racing car. The rest is about commercial opportunities.
Mick Schumacher has won races in F2, is in the Ferrari Young driver program, has a world famous father and would be a good news story for the sport and Ferrari. Of course he's going to be seen as a favourite for a drive.
It took Jolyon Palmer 4 years to win the GP2 title and Mick Schumacher's first season was massively better than Palmer's.
30 years ago there were anywhere between 26 and 30 seats for drivers and far more mid season changes and one of drives. With opportunities to drive being much smaller these days there are a wider range of factors being taken in to account.
If you were an F1 team boss and current holder of both world titles, would you employ a 33 year old driver whose entire racing record consisted of two podiums and no wins in 4 seasons of F3000, 1 Le Mans DNF, 6 failures to qualify and 2 finishes outside the top ten in F1?
If I gave you that CV you would laugh me out of your office.
But that's exactly what Sir Frank Williams looked at when he hired Damon Hill who went on to give him 21 wins, 20 poles, 40 podiums and the 1996 World Championship.