Hmmm,
Galahad. I'm not talking about under any manager other than Redknapp - certainly the Spurs team that was beaten by Sevilla when they were exceptional cannot be accused of undercooking the tournament.
However, this year, when they were playing PAOK in the do-or-die game, this was the team (
Who Scored):
Now I can see that Lennon and Modric were playing, but that is not a team that Spurs would put out for a serious league or cup match. Its not even rotation. It is sheer disrespect to either the competition or the opposition to put that side out there.
And I don't buy this argument that playing Thursday-Sunday is any different to playing Wednesday-Saturday as each Champions League team had to do at some point. If the Europa League is too tiring, then so is the Champions League - to win the Champions League you have to play only two games less than to win the Europa League, assuming entry at the equivalent round.
Frankly, if a team wants to succeed when it gets into the Champions League, why wouldn't it want a run in the Europa League first? For one thing it improves your seeding no end when you get there. A successful Europa league run can move you up 10 or 11 places in the ranking - if Atletico Madrid had got into the Champions League for next season they would be in Pot One. And, of course, it gives the players experience of playing two-legged European knockout football.
Whatsmore, the Europa League is a fine competition which deserves better than to be a run-out for Harry Kane. I don't like the idea of a club that hasn't won anything but the Carling Cup for 20 years to turn its nose up at "the wrong sort of silverware".
Hey ho, more seeding points will be on the way to Iberia. Lets hope Italy don't start taking the Europa League seriously or we'll find that fourth place no longer qualifies for a Champions League place anyway.