Current Fernando Alonso

Suprised there's no thread (although I had one for his blogs), so i'll start off:

A double world championship vs Raikkonen and then Schumacher in 2005 and 2006 respectively elevated Alonso's status but, apparently, no one told his rookie teammate at his brand new team of a theoretical 'pecking order' the following season ... and the Spaniard was 'seen off' by the young Englishman, Hamilton, into two years of Wilderness while both Hamilton and an even younger Vettel began to make their mark through '08 and '09.

Arguably, Alonso was in the Top 3 of all the Formula One 'Aces' in the 2000s following Hakkinen's retirement - up there with either Schumacher/Raikkonen and, then, Raikkonen/Hamilton - and remains so in the early 2010s along with Hamilton/Vettel...with only Kubica knocking on the door until the Pole's horrible Rallying accident.

A question mark initially over 2004 during which Trulli lead him in the standing until the Italian fell out with ex-manager and team boss Flavio Briatore (Alonso's then business manager) under dubious circumstances after the French Grand Prix.

Another question mark is...Who has progressed more since the end of 2007: Hamilton or Alonso?

A fan. Then came the unfortunate blackmail allegations against McLaren boss Ron Dennis on the morning of the 2007 Hungarian GP which came to light at the highly costly FIA 'Spy-Gate' hearings before Spa...followed by the odour of the deliberate crashing of the Number 2 Renault car at Singapore in 2008 which lead to Alonso finishing 1st in the event and ended in the banning of Briatore and Pat Symmonds a year later.

2009 was a poor year with 'Nando's' mind likely on the prospect of Santander paving the way to better prospects at Maranello one year earlier.

2010 was a fresh start at Ferrari (who no longer had Schumacher walking through the premises regularly) but first half season mistakes ultimately cost him a title inspite of being infamously aided by a Team Orders switch w Massa at Hockenheim (which lead to more world-wide criticism).

Relatively fast, relatively consistent but prone to mistakes and a possible insecurity complex (*) based on wanting sole focus from a team and being only happy with a Number 2 in the other car running behind him. Anything else and it seemingly rattles him.

(*) This is my own personal opinion.

..and so to 2011...

He's underperformed only at Malaysia (hit Hamilton) and China (invisible while Massa challenged McLarens and Red Bulls) and, arguably, Canada...but has maximized his chances in the other 6 races culminating in the British GP win.

He said in his post-Monaco blog that 'Silverstone would be the WDC cut-off'...and so, after some major upgrades, the Ferrari looks a winner again. It might be too late for 2011 given Vettel's finishing rate...but the 2012 regs means they should keep the hammer down at Maranello.

He's signed on through to 2016...So hopes are high of a WDC at some juncture...but not yet.
 
Maybe it's just that the 2007 and 2008 models were still evolutions from Rory Byrne's designs, which the radical aero rule changes of 2009 made impossible to evolve upon.
Some things are simple in F1, I think. You just have to say that those in charge of chief design ever since haven't been up to the job, and Ferrari just have a tendency to be slow in adapting to latest aero changes.
 
I think maybe we are being a little harsh in our judgements of Ferrari this season. At this stage of the season Ferrari are third in the constructors championship behind Red Bull and it's fair to say if Kimi had put in only half the results Fernando has they would be second behind Mercedes. The three other Mercedes powers cars, Williams, McLaren and Force India are all behind Ferrari in the constructors championship despite Kimi's poor results. The fact is if Mercedes hadn't been quite so dominant and Kimi had put in some better results Ferrari would be the best of the rest.
The only thing that plays against this of course is Alonso once again is carrying them to these results. I guess without him they would look terrible but at present, on paper they're closer to Mercedes than all with the exception of Red Bull.
 
Last edited:
Whilst we are all giving Alonso credit for carrying Ferrari to the high position single handely (which he is) I can't help but feel they would be in a far better position (despite the awful car) if they'd signed Nico Hulkenberg instead of Kimi. A move that, according to Brundle, Alonso vetoed.
 
Back
Top Bottom