cosicave said:
Awful things Matthew.
Motor-racing for the spectator must surely be a spectacle? As such there is a requirement to pay some attention to aesthetics.
- If they fail to do this adequately, they are at odds with the basic principles of a spectator sport. And, if you don't mind my saying so, Daytona prototypes are amongst the ugliest four wheelers ever to have sported numbers on their bonnets (hoods), or doors.
I'll give you that one, Cosi. DP's are not the hottest' cars out there, by any stretch of the imagination. And yes, they probably could use a facelift or three.
For the record, I'm probably more of a Grand-Am fan than I am a LeMans fan(Sebring, LeMans 24 and Petit LeMans being the exceptions to that) and there's a couple of reasons............
---Unlike the LMPs, which seem to pass into obsolescence after only a year, there's a lot more stability in the DP formula(they're currently mid-way through the five-year lifespan of the 2nd-generation DP although they've never made the 1st-generation DPs' obsolete under GA rules......in fact, there's at least, last time I remember, 2 1st-gen. Riley DPs' still being raced that were built in 2003-2004).
---The rules in Grand-Am are designed to contain costs & technology while providing for close competition. In addition, unlike in the ALMS or LeMans, there are no factory teams in Grand-Am; if you build an engine or chassis and GA approves, you have to make it available for everyone.
---Unlike this year over in the ALMS where they had to introduce 2 spec-series classes to keep the car counts up, GA still has two distinct classes, which they've had for about five years now. Surprisingly, the car counts in Grand-Am rival those in ALMS(about 30 or so cars in each series).