There's an article on the BBC about the bumper profits Formula One is making.
Or is it purely due to Bernie's ruthlessness at chasing the highest bidders for GPs?
Full article here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13438913
I'm sure this could probably be merged with an existing thread so feel free to do so if it fits mods.
Would the same amount of revenue be possible if the teams ran the show themselves?The Formula Money report says that F1's holding company made net profits in 2010 of $137.1m (£85m) after costs, which included paying race teams $658m.
It brings the net profits made since private equity firm CVC took control of F1 in 2006 to $1.22bn, the report says.
[...]
CVC, which now owns 63.4% of F1's Jersey-based parent company Delta Topco, made $87m from the sport in 2010, Formula Money estimates.
The remaining $50m in profits was split between investment banks and individuals who own the rest of Delta Topco, including Sir Martin Sorrell, boss of advertising giant WPP with a 0.3% stake.
And it brings to $800.8m the profits CVC has made in the five years since it paid $1.7bn for 69.6% of F1's commercial arm, the report says.
Christian Sylt, who with colleague Caroline Reid publishes the annual dissection of F1's finances, said that Delta Topco made revenues of $1.6bn last year, and $5.9bn over the five years. "It's an astonishing return," he said.
Or is it purely due to Bernie's ruthlessness at chasing the highest bidders for GPs?
To put it in perspective:The biggest single source of revenue last year was the race-hosting fees of about $567.5m, paid by governments and track owners to stage the events.
Microsoft paid $8 billion for Skype last week...Based on the latest figures Mr Sylt puts a $5bn-$7bn price tag on F1. "It's at least worth that, and may be worth more to a determined buyer," he said.
Full article here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13438913
I'm sure this could probably be merged with an existing thread so feel free to do so if it fits mods.