Current Alpine F1 (Formerly Renault)

Lotus Renault GP

FIA Entry: Renault F1
Car 9: Nick Heidfeld
Car 10: Vitaly Petrov
Engine: Renault V8
Team Principal: Eric Boullier
Technical Director: James Allison
Race Engineer Car 9: Simon Rennie
Race Engineer Car 10: Ayao Komatsu

Stats at end 2010

First Entered 1977
Races Entered 285
Race Wins 35
Pole Positions 51
Fastest Laps 31
Driver World Championships 2
Constructor World Championships 2

Team History

Renault first entered F1 as a constructor in 1977 at the British Grand Prix. At the height of the “garagiste” and Cosworth engines Renault entered a single car, driven by Jean-Pierre Jabouille, powered by a 1.5 litre turbo charged engine. Renault’s experiment with turbo charging probably changed F1 more than any other single event in the sport’s history.

Jabouille won Renault's first Grand Prix in 1979 in France and, up until their withdrawal as a constructor from the sport in 1985; Renault won 15 Grands Prix. They continued in F1 as an engine manufacturer until in 2002 they returned as a constructor having acquired the Benetton (formerly Toleman) team in 2000.

The “new” Renault Team

For 2002 Renault partnered Jarno Trulli and Jenson Button together and the team managed 4th place in the Constructors Championship. Button was dropped for 2003 in favour of the team’s test driver, Fernando Alonso. Alonso repaid the team’s faith by winning the Hungarian Grand Prix, the first win for a Renault car since 1983.

Jarno Trulli won the Monaco Grand Prix in 2004 but was replaced by Jacques Villeneuve before the end of the season as he and the team principal, Flavio Briatore, fell out amid claims of favouritism toward Alonso.

The Championship Years

Giancarlo Fisichella was brought in to replace Trulli for 2005 and duly won the first race in Australia. Alonso won the next 3 and a total of 7 in the season to win the Drivers World Championship and give Renault the Constructors’ Title they had long waited for; breaking Michael Schumacher 5 year run of driver's titles and and Ferrari's 6 year long strangle hold on the constructors title.

In 2006 the same pattern repeated, Fisichella took a single victory, Alonso 7 along with both the Drivers Championship and the Constructors Title.

Post Alonso (part 1)

Alonso’s departure to McLaren in 2007, replaced by rookie Heikki Kovalainen, left the team without a star driver to build around and the team struggled. Kovalainen outscored his more experienced team mate but a highest finish of 2nd in Japan was the best result on the track. The team finished 3rd in the Constructors Championship but as McLaren were disqualified from the championship in 2007 the result flatters to deceive.

After falling out with McLaren Alonso returned to Renault for 2008. Rebuilding around him, the car slowly improved and Alonso won races in Singapore and Japan. It later transpired that Alonso’s team mate in 2008, Nelson Piquet jnr, had deliberately crashed during the Singapore race with the collusion of team principal Briatore and Technical Director, Pat Symonds. This emerged in 2009 after Piquet was dropped by the team for Roman Grosjean resulting in Briatore and Symonds being banned from the sport and Renault being given a 2 years suspended ban.

2009 was a lean year for Renault. Alonso managed pole in Hungary but otherwise a single 3rd place in Singapore was the best placing the team could muster. The resulting bad publicity surrounding the race fixing allegations resulted in many of Renault’s major sponsors withdrawing finance from the team and put into question Renault’s continuing presence as an F1 team.

Post Alonso (part 2)

Alonso left for Ferrari in 2010 and Robert Kubica took his place, partnered by Russia’s first F1 driver Vitaly Petrov. At this time Renault sold a 75% share of the team to Luxembourg based venture capital company Genii. Renault continued to provide technical support and engines to the team. Kubica managed some podium places through the season whilst Petrov took some time to acclimatise to F1 with a best finish of 5th in Hungary, matching Renault’s finish in the Constructor’s Championship.

2011

For 2011 Renault sold it’s remaining 25% share to Lotus cars resulting in a change of team name to Lotus Renault GP causing a legal battle with Team Lotus as to who had the rights to use the name Lotus in F1. Renault will also race under a British licence this season leaving F1 without a French team for the first time since 1975.

Renault planned to retain the same driver line up but Kubica crashed in a rally car prior to pre-season testing and has been replaced by former team mate Nick Heidfeld. They will use the R31 chassis.
 
Grosjean is quicker than you think and quicker than people gave him credit for. During his stint at Renault before he wasn't actually that much slower than Alonso and now he's suppose to be even quicker.

He came in for Friday P1 at Abu Dhabi and was quicker than both Petrov and Senna.
 
What we don't know is how many points this car would have got with Kubica at the wheel.

I think the team has taken a step forward with the car since Spa, even if they don't have much to show for it in terms of results. Petrov could have been a strong seventh, perhaps even ahead of the delayed Massa.

Clearly the team has gone through more troubles than most, and the budget is a fraction of what it was when they were winning championships. I still believe the core of the team are strong, James Allison is an innovative designer, and Rob White will give them a good engine for the new turbo regs - but the losses of experienced hands like Pat Symonds and Bob Bell were very regrettable. They'll be fine, but might need to accept that their race-winning days are behind them, for the time being.

I hope the Lotus involvement doesn't turn out badly. Their plans (Lotus') are extremely ambitious.

Personally I do because of the stupid cheap stunt Dany Bahar tried to pull last year in trying to market the team as "Lotus". I don't share the same feeling as its another car manufacturer trying to cash in on a recognised brand name see Ford / Jaguar and - just look at Toyota, BMW and HOnda. They burned through a lot of money achieving very little so history is not on their side. Plus there has been a lot of upheaval between the guys at Enstone, Genii Capital and Proton so a fall out within the team could be detrimental. They've lost a lot of decent engineers and

I wonder if someone will ask why Proton - a car manufacturer in its own right is relying on another car manufacturer to supply F1 engines - Renault !
 
Grosjean is quicker than you think and quicker than people gave him credit for. During his stint at Renault before he wasn't actually that much slower than Alonso and now he's suppose to be even quicker.

He came in for Friday P1 at Abu Dhabi and was quicker than both Petrov and Senna.


I do have some sympathy for Grosjean in his last venture because he was just a pawn for Flavio to mess with Piquet Jnr then expected to be better than Nelson with no testing allowed and shortly Renault were facing allegations of cheating ..he really jumped into the fire !

I expect Grosjean to give Raikkonen a rude awakening given the race rustiness of Kimi out of F1 cars
 
I wonder if someone will ask why Proton - a car manufacturer in its own right is relying on another car manufacturer to supply F1 engines - Renault !

Well, I hope the answer to that is obvious.

I agree that Bahar is probably misguided at best, but I think the team at Enstone deserve some better management than they've had over recent years, and they're one of the teams I like to do well as they, at least, have the potential to break up the monopoly at the front of the grid, as they've shown before.
 
Lotus Renault? Why a problem? Lotus were a car maker who used a whole variety of engines over the years.

46505.19902.416039.preview.jpg


Mclaren are now a car manufacturer but still use Mercedes engines. Williams were sponsored for many years by Leyland but used Cosworth engines (I know it was Leyland trucks before anyone points it out). As Galahad points out, the reason why they use Renault engines is pretty obvious though.
 
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97524 Lotus technical director James Allison says that his team was happy to run the most laps of anybody in the first pre-season Formula 1 test at Jerez last week.
The team topped the first day of the test with Kimi Raikkonen, and ended the week with Romain Grosjean setting the quickest time of all the new cars present.
It racked up 404 laps over the four days without much in the way of mechanical dramas, leaving it at the top of the mileage chart.
The new Lotus E20 has already gained praise from rival teams and drivers. And while Allison is keen not to get carried away, he accepted that the car had got off to a good start.
 
Are Renault in a spot of bother with their chassis? Withdrawing from teasting, flying out another chassis and saying its highlighted something they need to look at? Doesnt sound too good.
 
Appears that they have already solved problem.
http://www.lotusf1team.com/We-Can-Work-it-Out.html
Barcelona test finishes early for Lotus F1 Team
Lotus F1 Team will not run for the remainder of the second test at Barcelona, scheduled from today until Friday.
During initial runs this morning with Romain Grosjean at the wheel, the team identified an issue with the chassis. After investigation at Enstone, initial plans to bring out chassis E20-01 to Barcelona have been held in order to give the team enough time to rectify the situation.
Lotus F1 Team will be back on track next week in Barcelona (1-4 March)
James Allison, Technical Director:

“Before we were due to fly chassis E20-01 out to Barcelona in replacement of chassis E20-02 - damaged this morning - we ran a series of simulations at the factory based on the data provided by our brief running on track today. As a result, we were able to identify an area which requires some additional work. It will be more productive for us to carry out these modifications to both chassis at Enstone rather than send E20-01 out to this week’s test. We’ll put the right measures in place and we will be able to fix the problem before next week.”
Eric Boullier, Team Principal:

“Not running this week has been a tough decision to take, but we feel that our choice is the right one. On the positive side, we have quickly identified the issue with the chassis and our design office has already devised a solution. We will be present at next week’s test in Barcelona. We draw faith from the fact that the E20 was quick out of the box in Jerez and showed its reliability there. We have a lot of work ahead of us over the next week but everyone at Enstone is ready for this challenge.”
 
Are Renault in a spot of bother with their chassis? Withdrawing from teasting, flying out another chassis and saying its highlighted something they need to look at? Doesnt sound too good.

Aren't Renault an engine supplier? What are they doing with a chassis?
 
"We have a lot of work ahead of us over the next week but everyone at Enstone is ready for this challenge.”
That doesnt sound ever so solved.

EDIT: Found a bit more. Its sounds like an engine mount problem and something to do with glue
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97620

Did you read the press release.Lotus know what the problem is.They have the answer.Ergo the problem is solved.
They have a lot of work to do to fix it. That could mean that they have to completely strip the car to the bare monocoque.Repair the the problem.Rebuild the car.
Thats the challenge.
 
Did you read the press release.Lotus know what the problem is.They have the answer.Ergo the problem is solved.
They have a lot of work to do to fix it. That could mean that they have to completely strip the car to the bare monocoque.Repair the the problem.Rebuild the car.
Thats the challenge.
I did read the press release. But I would expect a press release to downplay the problem. Im no technician but reading that autosport article it doesnt sound a piece of cake.
 
I'd rather have a problem and know what it is than have a problem and not know what it is. I don't think there is any reason to speculate, whatsoever, that they are in any way baffled by the problem that they have discovered. Sounds pretty clear that they know what they are doing and that they - without drawing a diagram and sharing thier technical information - have been pretty open.

It's clearly a blow to them to have to abandon testing without sensationalising the matter with speculation and invention.

[Edit] Just saw you're edit, Racecub. See, best not to jump to conclusions. If it looks like an elephant, it's probably an elephant.
 
Back
Top Bottom