I've seen Senna race in the late 80's and I got bored of Schumacher's one sided championships because it was obvious he had the best car and his teammate was never allowed to race him. The Bridgestones were made for Schumacher that is why Mclaren chose Michelin for 2002 because they felt Ferrari were being favoured for designs of the tyreYou don’t know this, I don’t know this and nobody will ever know this. Its just your opinion. You cant fairly compare any F1 driver from the 60’s to a modern one, the cars, the sport have changed just too much since then.
Btw, how old are you? Did you witness Clarks career? I didn’t. In fact did you actually witness all of Schumacher’s career or are you basing your opinions on things you’ve heard?
Its easy for him to be dominant if he has a NO 2 driver who is contractually not allowed to race him and two test drivers doing the extra miles for him with the team that spends the most every year except Toyota
Clark drove in Lotuses designed by Colin Chapman which were clearly the fastest cars most seasons and Clark was acknowledged as the best driver in that era and did not win more titles that 2 because invariably Chapman would design cars and try out new parts that would fail.
Chapman was a risk taker in trying to design faster cars