But Pollock was very good at being JV's manager. He got JV what was probably the second highest rate on the grid (shame that JV had to give some of it to his manager) whilst being one of the worst drivers.
I simply do not understand how the money providers can fail to spot has gone on at a number of teams. To me it looks like one of the biggest blot on F1.
That was the problem at BAR for a start JV got away with anything no matter if he was right or wrong he always had Pollock to back him
Spare a thought to those stressed out engineers trying to get the car right no wonder it was brittle if they were working under severe pressure and using the wrong practices despite warnings
Just ask ZOnta when he and JV tangled at Hockenheim 2000 ...Pollock was obviously going to side with JV on that account
Pollock to JV/BAR is like Briatore to ALonso/ Renault the difference was Renault knew it was a five year plan and were working towards it each year despite setbacks .... BAR tried to do things in 1 year !!! it was never going to work
BAT - the sponsors cared about was exposure so if Pollock came along saying we are going to run a new team with the world champion of 1997 plus we want to market the cars in both brands 555 and Lucky Strike.... money talks obviously that is until they realised it was against the rule book - whoops.
However Pollock was stubborn about it and wanting the cars in both liveries and was overruled before the cars even turned a wheel at its first GP -- some attention already for trying to take on the establishment and losing - not really endearingyourself into the F1 circus by getting off to a rocky start
Pollock was JV's school teacher if I remember rightly and their closeness was always going to affect the way the team performs and cloud his judgement
Pollock did get JV a ridiculous salary something like £10 - £15m a year based on his world champion status and when BAR under Richards wanted JV to take a pay cut to spend more money on development it was met with " Get Lost" and the start of JV's decline
Is Marko a team principal?
He is not a team principal as in being given the title of but he might as well be the way things Red Bull and Toro Rosso are run
My reason behind it is Horner and Tost are just two puppets on a string at Red Bull and Toro Rosso and Helmut is Dieter's right hand man.
Every time there is a mention about drivers driving for which team who decides it ? Its Marko just look at Toro Rosso who spoke about replacing Buemi and Alguarsauri not Tost but Marko saying they aint good enough
Horner just seems to follow what Helmut says and never dares to cross him ...I point to Turkey last year when Vettel and Webber crashed into each other. At the race Horner said the blame was on Vettel - a few days after Helmut Marko suggests Webber should have given more space , Horner changes his tune to yeah maybe it was Webber's fault
Obviously Horner has made one or two other bungling decisions which is why he is on this list
I voted for Tom Walkinshaw as he was all mouth and trousers in F1. For those for voted for Flavio, I can understand that many may not like him as a man but as a team principal, where the idea is that your team wins, he was brilliant.
It surprised me how Tom Walkinshaw never achieved the success had with Jagaur in F1 although he was responsible for making Benetton more organised whilst Flavio was sitting on the pitwall before taking over the Ligier team
His ambitious venture into Arrows did not pull off although getting Hill was a big coup and then John Barnard.
The promised money from Prince Malik did not materialise in 1998 . A resurgence from 1999 saw them getting close to the front teams a few times but never quite getting the results. His biggest mistake was firing Verstappen when Frentzen was free after Prost team folded. He obviously failed to remember Orange sponsored the team based on Verstappen being there
His other dealings were getting Cosworth engines in exchange for giving Jaguar a wind tunnel instead of £10m lease fee
I actually met one of his cousins on holiday in Majorca a few years back and she did mention his failed ventures in Rugby and Motor racing and apparently he had an extra marital affair as well
I agree with that, I don't think Briatore, Dennis, LdM, Todt, Horner, Sir Frank or Ken Tyrell should really be up there because they're all World Champions; and EJ punched above his weight too.
If I was an eccentric rich guy who wanted an F1 team, I wouldn't get Briatore into my team because I would always think he was acting for his own interests. But that doesn't mean he's not won 3 Constructors' titles...
I take your point that they've been proven winners but they 've made a few poor decisions and bad management along the way
up until crash gate which made me realise Briatore has actually left a trail of drivers where he benefitted financially but ruined their careers. I would have probably gone for Todt or Pollock.
Its interesting to see that despite the success that Todt bought to Ferrari it has not been universally appreciated at Maranello as Luca carefully started to dissamble it starting with asking Schumy to be equal status to Kimi for 2007 then not letting Brawn be promoted to succeed Todt and Stepney obviously was not happy his job changed as well before spygate