Grand Prix 2017 United States Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

And so we enter the final phase of the 2017 season and we are now at the point where the points leading driver can win the title should his rival finish lower than a certain position (in this case, 4th I believe). It just so happens that we arrive at a track where the Mercedes team have always ran well having won the last 3 races held there. Also, of the 5 races held to date, Hamilton has won 4 of them and his title rival Sebastian Vettel the other.

Quite why Ferrari have managed to implode in the second half of the season remains to be seen. Kimi hasn't really been in the races all year and Seb seems to be losing the plot at every opportunity. The increasing speed, reliability and confidence from the Red Bull camp has not helped matters but any hope of this season being a close two way battle between Vettel and Hamilton disappeared a long time ago. Only a monumental disaster could stop Hamilton from winning the title now.

As for the track, its always been a popular one with drivers, teams and fans and to be honest definitely rates as one of the least worst 'Tilkedromes'. Turn one has given us some exciting moments in previous races and Nico Rosberg credits Hamilton's wide elbows in 2015 for giving him the drive to take the 2016 title as he vowed not to let a driver do that to him again. The remainder of the track contains a few nods to various circuits around the world.

The thorn in Mercedes side at the last few races has been Red Bull and they will be waiting to pounce should they get the chance of a run at the Mercedes cars.

You know that F1 is in something of a state when outside of the top 6 the odds of another car winning a race have been quoted by some book makers as 1000/1. There are many squabbles throughout the midfield with those all important points bringing home an extra few million dollars. With the departure of Jolyon Palmer from Renault all eyes will be on Carlos Sainz to see if he can get closer to Hulkenberg. Meanwhile back at Sainz's old team, Daniel Kyvat is set to make his latest comeback to racing.

Can Hamilton win the title here then?
 
I haven't used this expression on here in a long time but "Please, don't feed the troll".

Look you guys can gang up on me. But remember you are messing with a guy whose parents were killed in front of him when he was a kid! You don't know how I could react!

Kidding aside, I feel like you are marginalizing and trivializing my point of view. However my point of view is shared by a couple of the titans of the Formula One Industry - Both Niki Lauda and Ross Brawn share this perspective. Read their recent interviews on Autosport. Your perspective is shared by the stewards. This is the difference between people who can see a couple of corners, and people who see the big picture.
 
Your opinion is shared by two people who have a vested interest in the vested interest of their own future and their bank balances. Both have become the parts of the sport that are the anathaema of the fan.
I'm sure there are also titans of the sport that do not share the view of Brawn and Lauda.
Lauda was one of the greatest drivers.
Brawn was one of the greatest team managers.
Stewards are appointed to steward the event....they can't get it wrong because they are the arbiters.
Don't like it?
Tough.
 
Your opinion is shared by two people who have a vested interest in the vested interest of their own future and their bank balances. Both have become the parts of the sport that are the anathaema of the fan.
I'm sure there are also titans of the sport that do not share the view of Brawn and Lauda.
Lauda was one of the greatest drivers.
Brawn was one of the greatest team managers.
Stewards are appointed to steward the event....they can't get it wrong because they are the arbiters.
Don't like it?
Tough.

Don't like where it's headed? Tough! Your thinking is out of touch and out of date.
 
I'm not going to dismiss Batman's point but it would only work if the track surface is the best and fastest surface to drive on; in other words, change the run-off so it penalises drivers who leave the track.
 
I don’t know why we can’t have grass in places. Yes, it’s slippery but that’s the point it’ll prevent drivers from cutting corners. In the old days, drivers rarely ever had tracks as wide as the ones nowadays. The margin for error was a lot smaller and yet they managed. This generation is rather spoilt in terms of safety features; they sit in nearly indestructible cars, race on endless pieces of tarmac, etc..
 
to go on a different point from that race. that was swept aside because arguably 1 of the most controversial moments of the season. that gap to Top 3 team to everyone else was quite scary to me & proved to be situation that is needing sorting asap. that its almost getting into a lmp1 & lmp2 situation. because a minute separated them in Mexico & kimi starting 10th was still 40 secs in Japan
 
I don’t know why we can’t have grass in places. Yes, it’s slippery but that’s the point it’ll prevent drivers from cutting corners. In the old days, drivers rarely ever had tracks as wide as the ones nowadays. The margin for error was a lot smaller and yet they managed. This generation is rather spoilt in terms of safety features; they sit in nearly indestructible cars, race on endless pieces of tarmac, etc..

Agree. Grass is not too bad an option. Especially rough deep grass.
 
Massive disagreement in my house, I want to see racing and the championship up for grabs right up to the last race. Hubby wants to see Vettel and Ferrari out of it any time soon. He thinks that Ferrari cheat.
 
This one?

article-2526846-1A3681FB00000578-75_634x662.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom