Grand Prix 2012 Spanish Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

With the flyaway races finished for the time being the F1 bandwagon rolls into Europe for the first time for the Spanish Grand Prix. Traditionally this race hasn't provided the most entertaining of races with the pole sitter more often than not going on to win the race. 2011 was no exception as pole sitter Sebastian Vettel went on to win the race, however he wasn't by any means cruising as Lewis Hamilton charged him down and almost managed to take the lead off the young German but ran out of laps as he just couldn't get into the DRS window around a track that is difficult to overtake on.

Going into this years race it is virtually impossible on who is going to win the race. So far there have been 4 different winners with Jenson Button, Fernando Alonso, Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel all having stood on the top step of the podium so far this season and there hasn't been any team which has been consistently at the front at all four races with everyone having their fair share of problems and also benefiting from other peoples problems. The only truly consistent teams seem to be in the regions of midfield with teams like Williams who are now regular contenders for points after their 2012 car is proving to be far better than their dismal 2011 effort which barely managed to get a point and they have already surpassed last years total in just 4 races which isn't a bad achievement considering both drivers weren't exactly tipped for great things this season.

The buzzword at Mclaren at the moment and particularly for Lewis Hamilton is undoubtedly pit stops after a series of poor stops destroyed his race in Bahrain and also in Australia when he got caught out by the safety car. Jenson Button has also been affected by poor pit stops which show how these aren't isolated incidents and it is something that Mclaren urgently need to address as there is virtually no chance of getting on the podium let alone winning a race if they keep botching pit stops, for example, Hamilton lost well over 20 seconds from just pit stop problems which robbed them of at the very least 4th place if not a podium but this was probably unlikely given the supreme pace of Raikkonen and Grosjean in the lotus cars.

Indeed, lotus finally managed their most consistent race of the season and showed that they have designed a very fast race car as Kimi Raikkonen very nearly won his first race since returning to the sport in only his fourth race as an aggressive race saw him get within striking distance of leader Vettel but ultimately fell slightly away and had to settle for second which was still a fantastic result and with Grosjean finishing a comfortable third things are looking up for lotus going into the European season.

Barcelona is traditionally a hot and dry race although there have been wet races before although there hasn't been a rain affected race for a good number of years now. However it will be still difficult to suggest a possible winner as it depends who was the most productive at the Mugello test which starts today (Tuesday 1st May) and teams like Ferrari are banking that the raft of updates and upgrades that they will bring to the car for Barcelona will kick start their stuttering season which would be a boost for Fernando Alonso at his home race and an improved car would easily give him a good chance of a third drivers championship as he has already won a race in the below average Ferrari that is lower points at best at this moment in time but that could change for Barcelona and they will need to otherwise heads could be rolling at Maranello if Ferrari are out of the Championship before it has barely got going.

For Galahad 's brilliant circuit write up, see here http://cliptheapex.com/pages/circuit-de-catalunya/
 
Fenderman- the high nose approach is used by the aerodynamicists to channel air around the coke-bottle back end of the car to get air to the diffuser. All of the detail under the high nose is to move the air towards the back of the car. To see this check out the footage looking back under the car from the front wing. There was a shot from the Force India with 22 minutes left in the second session that showed this so well.

A lower nose pushes more air up and over the car and can't get as much to the diffuser.
 
Fenderman
As fa as I know the first instance of the high nose concept was actually the work of Jean-Claude Migeot and Harvey Postlthwaite when they worked together at Tyrrell. The Tyrrell 019 opened the floodgate in 1990:

tyrell%20019.jpg
 
Westy The issue I was pointing out was that one doesn't want a lot of air going under the car. One wants as little as possible moving as fast possible to create a low pressure area as close to a vacuum as possible. Forcing more air through creates a high pressure area which will create lift. The issue is easy to test for yourself. Hold your hand out of a car window as you are moving at speed with your fingers straight and holding your hand flat and pointing into the "wind". Then "cup" your hand and raise the angle of attack - i.e. fingers curved but still pointing into the wind but with your palm lower. You will feel the effect that I am talking about.
 
There is a trade off between what you're doing with the air above the car and underneath the car Westy. As Fenderman pointed out, the logical philosophy to underside of the car is to create as low pressure as possible. Less air, and faster air, both create this effect. The only reason I can think that Mclaren have decided to have the higher nose is that the positives gained from the effects of the air above the car must outweigh the negatives of creating higher pressure underneath the car.

I'm by no means an expert though.
 
Very interesting race simulation run in FP2. Lewis set his fastest time of his race simulation on his 10th lap. Jenson had similarly low deg over his 12 lap run. Looking at the longer stints, it appears that we could see a "hitting the cliff" effect here considering both Lotuses and Schumacher had similar low deg runs to the Mclarens for first 10-12 laps, before losing 2 seconds in a few laps. On the whole, Lotus, Mclaren and Mercedes all appear to be having good race runs here, but Red Bull's times were very unimpressive and seemed to rise much faster. Sorry I don't have info on what tyre they were on.

Spain.webp
 
Judging by some tweets, Hamilton seems to be having clutch and launch issues.
They've been making clutch changes and the last change resulted in him not being able to launch the car in first or second.

If they can't resolve it then he's going to have major problems at the start.
 
Brogan well let's hope that him and Webber aren't 1 and 2 or the concertina effect of cars behind will be insane. Surely this will be something they'll be able to sort out pretty sharpish. Barely worth qualifying if he has to launch in 3rd gear. lol
 
What is going to be interesting in quali is whether anyone will risk not going out on the softs in Q1. I've mentioned this previously, but we seem to have 2 classes in Q1 these days, those who only use mediums and those who do a run on softs. Being last of either group could see you out in Q1. In fact, whoever is last of the top 8 will surely have to run again, but then that will force 7th to run, and that will force 6th to run, etc.
 
If it was me, johnnoble1990 I would put enough for 3 flying laps of fuel in and do one stint on softs.

I would not be risking it in q1 on hards...

If I was going for q3 I might use new softs in q2 but if was either good for pole or not hoping for q3 I might well reuse the q1 softs.

I would either be out in q2 with five sets of tyres or through to q3 with two new sets of softs.
 
I suspect everyone will do a run on the mediums anyway, as that seems to be the standard. I think the 4th set of hard tyres means it is just free track time really.
 
Apparently according to the beeb the bloke doing the left rearwheel-gunning (the who was deemed responsible for those slow McLaren pit-stops) has been given the boot by McLaren.... feel a bit sorry for him. Such a high pressured-environment and a few seconds gets you the blame for an entire race....
 
I understand why you feel for him, but this is the pinnacle of his profession. You have to get it right or you not going to be around for long. It could be seen as scapegoating though, as by no means can they claim that 1 person is responsible for the disaster that is Mclaren. Did they also say he was their lead strategist?
 
As I understand, the guys who do the wheels are all volunteers, all of whom also perform other jobs during the weekend, I believe that even truck drivers etc are able to volunteer, due to the restrictions in place regarding how many team members they are allowed at a race meeting (RRA thing)
 
Track temperature higher than in Bahrain at 38C - completely negates all the track data they got in winter testing...
 
Might have something to do with the apparent fact lap-time differences between the two compounds are much bigger than anticipated. That'll cause a bit of hgead-scratching among strategists and might make the race more unpredictable.
 
Back
Top Bottom