Autosport is reporting data published by Mercedes analysing the performance of pit crews over the season. Their conclusions were
Average cumulative total for pitstop times from 17 races held so far this year relative to fastest overall time:
1= Red Bull Racing Best
1= Mercedes GP Best
3 McLaren + 0.3s
4 Force India + 0.4s
5 Ferrari + 0.5s
6 Renault + 0.9s
7 Williams + 1.1s
8= Lotus + 1.3s
8= Sauber + 1.3s
8= Toro Rosso + 1.3s
11 Virgin + 1.6s
12 HRT + 3.2s
I read "average cumulative total" as being the amount of time lost per race (3 stops at +0.1s = McLaren's +0.3s), but over on the actual Mercedes site, they describe this as a per stop figure, so this would be Ferrari losing half a second every stop.
Whichever, does anyone have any ideas what Merc & RBR do that makes them so much quicker?
Average cumulative total for pitstop times from 17 races held so far this year relative to fastest overall time:
1= Red Bull Racing Best
1= Mercedes GP Best
3 McLaren + 0.3s
4 Force India + 0.4s
5 Ferrari + 0.5s
6 Renault + 0.9s
7 Williams + 1.1s
8= Lotus + 1.3s
8= Sauber + 1.3s
8= Toro Rosso + 1.3s
11 Virgin + 1.6s
12 HRT + 3.2s
I read "average cumulative total" as being the amount of time lost per race (3 stops at +0.1s = McLaren's +0.3s), but over on the actual Mercedes site, they describe this as a per stop figure, so this would be Ferrari losing half a second every stop.
However, in order to build a complete picture of pit stop speed, the average pit stop time is more representative. The team calculates this using a method that discounts repair stops, which require different procedures and are not therefore ‘clean’ tyre changes. Additionally, stops carried out under the safety car are ignored if pit lane traffic significantly affected performance.
...
Using the average stop-time calculations, an overall league table can be drawn up, reflecting the consistency in speed of each team.
Whichever, does anyone have any ideas what Merc & RBR do that makes them so much quicker?