Cadlillac makes alot of senseI predict Horner will go to either Audi or Cadillac with a possible outside chance of Aston Martin and will buy in with a chunk of Equity like Toto Wolf. Because being sacked will leave a bad taste and the best way to avoid that is to have real equity.
Audi not yet not sure Wheatley will like itI predict Horner will go to either Audi or Cadillac with a possible outside chance of Aston Martin and will buy in with a chunk of Equity like Toto Wolf. Because being sacked will leave a bad taste and the best way to avoid that is to have real equity.
ive been actively searching this out what did he do. because i dont mean to be harsh but he seized the opportunity to sign an unhappy newey. that deserves credit. but as i must said above in more details he feels quite low down on the list of why red bull succeeded. but because this question as bugged me since he was sacked. "what did Horner contribute post 2005"he has been the most successful team principal over the last 20 years and that can't have been in spite of him.
Absolutely.I would imagine there is a queue of people waiting to give him a job. Regardless of what you think of him personally, he has been the most successful team principal over the last 20 years and that can't have been in spite of him.
i think it was more mutual beneficial relationship. we cant forget when red bull were angry at sky & banned them from talking to their drivers mexico 2023?The second, and this is not directly his fault, was the never ending love affair between Sky and Horner. You can't tell me no other boss would talk to F1 from the put wall, before, during and after the race?
I echo this cue the supposedly Sky is bias towards Brits and Red Bull not getting enough attention claims m9an by Horneri think it was more mutual beneficial relationship. we cant forget when red bull were angry at sky & banned them from talking to their drivers mexico 2023?
Horner loves the sound of his own voice so any chance to be on tv he's going to take it, in same way its reason why he was only the major teams to be on 1st season of drive to survive & sky sports are never going to pass an opportunity to talk to a title leading team
They did not do enough when free sandwiches was masking costs and really let Red Bull off the hook. Then they gave in to his demands ,but the flexibility wing row just proves Mclaren are better than Red Bull in all departments except maybe the driver so he is out of excuses why Red Bull have dropped like a stoneI had two problems with Horner.
The first was where F1 could have had better cost controls years ago but as laid out in ex Williams CEO's book The Art of War, just as everyone had agreed to a cost management plan for F1, at the very last minute, Horner sold them all out.
What I hadn't realised until today was that Horner was a protege of a certain Mr Bernie Ecclestone and had been close to him prior to taking the Red Bull role and apparently was at one time considered by Bernie to be the heir apparent.
The second, and this is not directly his fault, was the never ending love affair between Sky and Horner. You can't tell me no other boss would talk to F1 from the put wall, before, during and after the race? Look at it now, the mic is shared about and we hear from all angles.
It's by design. The Sky they are talking about is Sky Sports UK. They have a British audience. If there is any bias in their coverage it is because they are catering to their audience which has it's own bias,I echo this cue the supposedly Sky is bias towards Brits and Red Bull not getting enough attention claims m9an by Horner
Assholes of the world uniteThey did not do enough when free sandwiches was masking costs and really let Red Bull off the hook. Then they gave in to his demands ,but the flexibility wing row just proves Mclaren are better than Red Bull in all departments except maybe the driver so he is out of excuses why Red Bull have dropped like a stone
The Bernie connection is interesting as he is making noises that Horner has been treated shamefully by Red Bull.
Not as traumatic as the rest of us for the last 20 years.
Too harsh?
Fuck it!
Everyone dies.
Get Facebook
Then you can't act the way they did when Verstappen 's driving was questioned in Mexico last yearIt's by design. The Sky they are talking about is Sky Sports UK. They have a British audience. If there is any bias in their coverage it is because they are catering to their audience which has it's own bias,
If Horner doesn't like it he can hire a British driver instead of a dick head.
Most UK broadcasters get a kicking of they don't attempt to be balanced in their coverage. Don't forget, Red Bull are an Austrian registered team who haven't had a British driver since David Coulthard. There's absolutely no reason for Sky Sports in the UK to show any bias towards RBR for a British audience and yet there was Horner never off our screens for a decade.It's by design. The Sky they are talking about is Sky Sports UK. They have a British audience. If there is any bias in their coverage it is because they are catering to their audience which has it's own bias,