Reply to thread

Well yes they can't have evidence for everything because some of it would have to come from Redbull. It's not an out of hand dismissal and this is no different to a normal investigation where certain causal factors are discounted based on clear and indisputable evidence to narrow the areas of interests. I really don't understand how you can take this stance when we've not seen a full transcript of Pirelli's findings and the supporting evidence. They've released a public statement and Redbull would not have endorsed it without seeking assurances. I do like a questioning attitude and I don't want to come across as patronising but to suggest Pirelli have carried out their investigation in the absence of hard evidence is a bit unfair I think and does them a disservice.