Grand Prix 2012 United States Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

Yeehaw!
Saddle up and let's mosey on down to Texas for the penultimate round of the 2012 season.

(Okay, that's quite enough of that...)

If it wasn't for the fact that Red Bull and Vettel have all but tied both titles up, this would be one of the most exciting ends to a season for a while.

What we should have had is two or three drivers on approximately level points heading to an unknown circuit, which by all accounts looks like it's going to be a challenge for even the best drivers. Turn one in particular is a blind left at the crest of a hill, which could either make or break the race.
Instead, what we have is a dominant Red Bull who need just four points to take the Constructors' title and Sebastian Vettel who only needs to outscore Fernando Alonso by 15 points or more over the next two rounds to take the Drivers'.

The wheels have come off at McLaren with yet another retirement for Hamilton when leading comfortably at Abu Dhabi; this time due to a faulty fuel pump. McLaren have prosecuted a dreadful campaing this year; without doubt they should have been in a position to take both titles and instead they are unlikely to even be runners up in both.
Where did it all go wrong?

Renault scored their first victory of the season with Kimi Räikkönen. Apparently it was "nothing to jump around about" so we'll say no more.

Mercedes had another race to forget with both cars finishing outside the top 10. Again. One has to hope that this is not a precursor to next season's performance and the redesigned car will be a lot more competitive. They may be able to hang on to fifth in the Constructors' but that will be dependent on how many points the Sauber drivers squander, of which Pérez has been doing an admirable job since he signed for McLaren.

Force India and Williams are in their own private battle in both championships but the Force Indias are in the driving seat (thank you, I'm here all week) and look as if they will just have the edge.

Sadly, for another year, the three "new" teams still occupy all of the bottom places. Caterham had an opportunity during last week's race of attrition to jump Marussia into 10th place, which they currently hold thanks to Timo Glock's 12th place finish at Singapore, but Kovalainen was overtaken in the closing stages. The really sad part is I can't see this ever being any different; the step change in performance required to breach the gap just seems to be unattainable.

For those who haven't seen the circuit, this is the view from the start-finish straight to turn one:
austin-straight-jpg.5108


Here's an onboard lap:

Galahad's circuit write up is here: http://cliptheapex.com/pages/circuit-of-the-americas/

Burgers, weak beer and popcorn are available from the concession stands (OK, OK, I'll stop now :D)
 
Yes I think it's unlikely too. But if Hamilton has more unreliability, maybe there's an outside chance. Schumi has never been a favourite of mine but I've admired him coming back and sticking at it. It would be nice if he left his come back with a win.

I think unreliability is Michael's middle name this season.
 
What is interesting is if Ferrari do give Massa a 5 place penalty and then lose 2nd place in the constructors as a consequence. I guess going for the WDC is more important.

I'm still not entirely buying how bad this start will be for the even grid slots. JB said yesterday that he started on the odd side and even that was really bad. I imagine 3rd will get 2nd but 4th will have same disadvantage, so I'm not sure 5th would get 2nd. I guess we will see.
 
What is interesting is if Ferrari do give Massa a 5 place penalty.

Don't you need a valid reason to change the gearbox or engine? Or is that is if you retire from a grand prix and need a new one for the next race?

Also if Ferrari do that, it's just a new low, and I used to support this team.

Be funny if Massa is still faster and jumps him at the stops.
 
The story from Ferrari is that his engineers have genuine concerns about the state of his gearbox, according to autosport. You can choose whether or not to believe that, of course, but it would be a massive gamble if they do it purely to get both drivers on the right side of the grid. I certainly don't think they'd do it just to move Alonso up one place as Massa can do him just as much good by trying to get involved with the guys at the front.
 
Just been reading the debate on twitter. They can do it, however the FIA could impose parc ferme rules instead and make him start from the pit lane therefore all current grid positions stand.
 
The parc ferme rules are becoming more and more of a mystery to me, I have no idea what they can and can't change any more. There seems to be no possibility of Jenson having to start from the back/pit lane, for example (based on the lack of stories), but presumably McLaren will have to fix something on his car (maybe just push the factory reset button though...).
 
Well if they are, and the 'even' half of the grid is really that bad, it seems like a logical decision. Makes you wonder 'what if' Hamilton had beaten Vettel to pole...
 
WCC pays more than WDC, but WDC gets more publicity. If Vettel got away with so much in Abu Dhabi which was within the rules then why should Ferrari not play the rules game as well?

I still don't like this though.
 
If it was Alonso I would understand, but Massa? It's a step too far.

If Red Bull did that too Webber, it would be a different story as the majority of people would be claiming it "unsporting", "unfair" "change the rules".
 
Back
Top Bottom